Automated Sorting Robot for Variable Stacking Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The delivery and sorting of goods, particularly non-palletized items like car tires, face challenges in automated unloading and quality control due to variable stacking patterns during transport, leading to inefficient manual processes prone to errors and requiring significant workforce, which complicates quick discharge and storage.

Innovation Solution

A system involving EDP-based recording of delivery notes, optoelectric scanning for parameter determination, and programmable algorithms for charge carrier allocation, combined with conveyor and sorting robots for automated sorting and palletization, minimizes human intervention and reduces errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual processes are used for unloading and sorting goods, then flexibility and adaptability to different goods are maintained, but productivity is low and workforce requirements are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedischarge speedVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated identification and sorting. Scan units automatically read identification data from goods, the control unit automatically determines sorting destinations, and conveyor routing units automatically transport goods to correct locations without human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical sorting operations are replaced by an automated system combining optical scanning (scan units), computational logic (control unit with algorithms), and automated conveyor mechanisms. This substitutes human physical labor with automated mechanical and electronic systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of time

If automated systems are introduced for unloading and sorting, then productivity increases and service time decreases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice life of means of transportVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality through a modular architecture where scan units, conveyor routing units, and the control unit can handle multiple types of goods with different identification methods (barcodes, RFID, optical recognition). The same basic infrastructure serves various sorting requirements without needing completely separate systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit acts as an intermediary that bridges the scan units and conveyor routing units. It receives identification data, processes sorting logic through algorithms, and generates routing commands, thereby coordinating the complex interactions between different system components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If manual recording and sorting of goods is performed, then adaptability to different goods types is maintained, but measurement precision and recording accuracy decrease due to human errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecording accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Manual visual inspection and recording are replaced by automated scan units that optically read identification data and transmit it to the control unit. This eliminates human reading errors and ensures consistent, accurate data capture across all goods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through the control unit comparing scanned identification data against the delivery note and goods receipt. This verification process ensures recording accuracy by detecting and correcting discrepancies automatically

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If goods are delivered in variable stacking patterns, then loading efficiency is maintained, but automated discharge becomes difficult due to unpredictable positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedischarge speedVSAvoidposition determination difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

Each good performs self-identification by presenting its identification data (barcode, RFID tag, or optical features) to the scan unit. This eliminates the need for the system to determine physical position or orientation, as goods automatically provide their identification information regardless of stacking pattern

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detection parameter from physical position (which varies with stacking patterns) to identification data (which remains constant). By scanning identification markers rather than relying on positional information, the system can handle any stacking configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system enables fully automated and efficient sorting and storage of goods, reducing workforce needs, minimizing service times, and ensuring accurate tracking and quality control, adaptable for various goods and supply chain transparency.

Implementation Method 1

Transfer the goods on the first conveyor routing unit to at least one first scan unit, wherein the specific parameters of the respective goods are recorded by the at least one first scan unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptoelectric scanning: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP3592476B1Method for sorting goods
Publication Date: 2022.12.07 SCHMITT PROF MOEHLMANN & COLLEGEN WIRTSCHAFTSKANZLEI INSOLVENZVERWALTER AG
  • EP3592476B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3592476B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for sorting loose goods of different dimensions, comprising the following method steps: A) EDP-assisted recognition of the delivery label and determining the target goods input value; B) allocating a sufficient number of load carriers according to the target goods input value; C) providing a first conveyor section unit with goods from the amount of delivered goods; D) transporting the goods on the first conveyor section unit to at least one first scanning unit; E) detecting the specific parameters of the respective goods using the at least one first scanning unit; F) transmitting the specific parameter of the respective goods to a distributer station via the at least one first scanning unit; G) forwarding the scanned goods to a distributer station on a further conveyor section unit; H) allocating the respective goods to one of the conveyor sections connected to a distributer station using the distributer station and according to the specific parameter of the respective goods and the load carrier determined from same using an algorithm; I) transmitting the further processing data for the respective goods from the distributer station to an appropriate sorting robot; K) the appropriate sorting robot retrieving the goods from the connected conveyor section unit; L) the appropriate sorting robot palletising the goods into the allocated load carrier; M) aligning the target goods input value with the actual goods input value. The invention also relates to a corresponding device.