Automated Sorting System with Multi-Angle Imaging for Nonstandard Item Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sorting systems are labor-intensive, expensive, and lack accuracy in sorting products, especially those with irregular shapes, requiring manual manipulation and longer sorting times to achieve desired precision.

Innovation Solution

A sorting system and method utilizing an item carrier with zones for charging, detection, and sorting, where items are imaged from different angles to identify nonstandard items, and a picking system isolates these items based on image analysis, with rollers and orientation-changing zones to facilitate accurate sorting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual removal and manipulation of items are used for sorting, then sorting accuracy can be improved, but labor intensity and operating costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting accuracyVSAvoidlabor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical manipulation with an automated imaging and identification system. Multiple images are captured from different angles, processed to identify nonstandard items, and then robotic pickers automatically remove these items, eliminating the need for manual labor while maintaining high sorting accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates optical copies (images) of the items from multiple angles and positions. These image copies are then analyzed to identify nonstandard items without requiring physical manual inspection, enabling automated decision-making for sorting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If multiple images are captured from different angles to identify nonstandard items, then sorting accuracy is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection zone is divided into multiple segments (first detection zone with first imaging device, second detection zone with second imaging device). Each segment captures images from different angles, and the results are combined to improve identification accuracy while keeping each individual imaging device relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds spatial dimensions to image capture by placing imaging devices at different positions and angles. The first imaging device captures images from one angle while the second imaging device captures images from another angle, creating a multi-dimensional view that improves identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If items are physically distanced and oriented for better imaging, then image quality and sorting accuracy improve, but the time required for sorting increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidsorting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Items are pre-oriented and physically distanced in the charging zone before entering the detection zone. This preliminary arrangement ensures that when items reach the imaging devices, they are already in optimal positions for capture, eliminating the need for time-consuming repositioning during detection and reducing overall sorting time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous item flow through the charging zone, detection zone, and sorting zone. Items are continuously oriented and imaged without interruption, and nonstandard items are continuously identified and removed, ensuring that the useful action of sorting proceeds without breaks or delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Extent of automation

If nonstandard items are isolated using automated picking systems, then labor costs are reduced, but device complexity and initial investment increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidpicking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces robotic pickers as intermediary devices between the detection zone and sorting zone. These pickers receive identification information from the imaging system and automatically execute the removal of nonstandard items, serving as a mediator that translates detection data into physical sorting action without requiring human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11845110B2Sorting system and corresponding method
Publication Date: 2023.12.19 PREMIER TECH TECH LTD
  • US11845110B2 patent drawing
  • US11845110B2 patent drawing
  • US11845110B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure concerns a method for sorting items transported along a conveyance direction on an item carrier of a sorting system, the item carrier comprising a charging zone, a first detection zone, an item orientation-changing zone, a second detection zone and a sorting zone, the method comprising sequentially: loading the items on the item carrier in the charging zone; capturing a first image of the items in the first detection zone; changing an orientation of the items in the item orientation-changing zone, located downstream of the first detection zone; capturing a second image of the items in the second detection zone, located downstream of the first detection zone; identifying nonstandard items amongst the items from information derived from the first and second images; and isolating the identified nonstandard items in the sorting zone. It also concerns a corresponding sorting system.