Sound Absorbing Structure with Porous Rendering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sound absorbing structures either have visible joins when using preformed elements or compromise on sound absorption when aiming for a monolithic, smooth surface like conventional plaster or plasterboard.

Innovation Solution

A sound-absorbing structure comprising abutted elements with a filler and a porous, monolithic rendering that maintains high sound absorption coefficients while providing a smooth, aesthetically pleasing surface, achieved by using sound-absorbing elements with an acoustic absorption coefficient of at least 0.7 and a rendering with specific surface roughness parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If preformed sound absorbing elements are used, then sound absorption properties are improved, but visible joins appear between adjacent elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound absorption propertiesVSAvoidmonolithic surface appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The sound absorbing structure is divided into multiple preformed elements (panels, tiles, or other elements) that are substantially abutted together. Each element maintains its individual sound absorbing properties while the collective arrangement creates the desired monolithic appearance when combined with filler and rendering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Filler material is introduced as an intermediary substance cast between the joins of adjacent elements to minimize the appearance of joins. This filler acts as a mediator that bridges the gap between segments, creating a more continuous surface appearance while preserving the sound absorbing functionality of the underlying elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Shape

If conventional plaster rendering is applied over sound absorbing elements, then a monolithic surface is achieved, but sound absorption properties are seriously reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonolithic surface appearanceVSAvoidsound absorption properties
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The rendering is formulated with specific local qualities - it is porous and physically or chemically cured to create a surface that maintains acoustic transparency. The rendering layer is designed to be acoustically permeable, allowing sound waves to pass through to the sound absorbing elements beneath while still providing the desired monolithic surface appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The rendering is specifically designed to be porous, which is crucial for maintaining sound absorption properties. The porous structure allows sound waves to penetrate through the rendering layer to reach the sound absorbing elements below, preventing the rendering from acting as an acoustic barrier while still providing a smooth, monolithic surface appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Reliability

If sound absorbing rendering with coarse fibrous material is applied, then sound absorption properties are improved, but surface smoothness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound absorption propertiesVSAvoidsurface smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The rendering is formulated as a composite material combining porous binder particles with fine particulate material. This composite structure provides both the acoustic properties needed for sound absorption and the surface smoothness required for aesthetic appearance. The fine particles fill gaps between porous binder particles, creating a dense yet acoustically permeable surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The particle size of the rendering materials is carefully controlled to achieve the desired balance between smoothness and porosity. By adjusting particle size parameters and the ratio of different materials, the rendering achieves a surface that appears smooth and continuous while maintaining the porous structure necessary for sound absorption functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves sound absorption properties comparable to preformed elements while offering a monolithic, smooth surface that is aesthetically comparable to conventional plaster or plasterboard, with an acoustic absorption coefficient of at least 0.7 and surface roughness values that enhance the appearance.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of substantially abutted, sound-absorbing, elements having an acoustic absorption coefficient αw of at least 0.7

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic absorption: Acoustic Absorption

Data Source

PatentUS7906205B2Sound absorbing structures
Publication Date: 2011.03.15 ROCKWOOL AS

AI summary

A sound-absorbing structure is provided which comprises a plurality of sound-absorbing tiles or other elements fitted in position, filler cast between the elements so as to provide a substantially flat surface with the elements, and a monolithic rendering which is porous but extends over the substantially flat surface and provides a very smooth surface without significantly reducing the sound-absorbing properties of the elements.