Sound Control Device Effect Setting Hold Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sound control devices lack flexibility in effect setting switching, as the performance and effect settings are linked, causing the readjusted effect settings to be reset when switching performances, limiting the performer's ability to maintain customized settings during live performances.

Innovation Solution

A sound control device with a selector for choosing setting information, a sound signal generator, and a switcher that allows users to toggle between a hold-enabled state and a hold-disabled state, ensuring that effect settings are maintained or switched accordingly, even when switching performances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the performance and effect setting are linked in the conventional configuration, then the system maintains simplicity and automatic coordination between performance and effect settings, but the flexibility for the performer to maintain customized effect settings during performance switching is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in effect setting switchingVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the setting information into distinct components: performance information and effect setting information. The selector is configured to select performance information, while the effect setting information is maintained separately. This segmentation allows the effect settings to be preserved independently when switching performances, thereby increasing flexibility without significantly complicating the overall system structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between the selector and the sound signal generator. It receives performance information from the selector, determines whether to switch effect settings based on this information, and then controls the sound signal generator accordingly. This intermediary role allows for intelligent decision-making about when to switch or maintain effect settings, resolving the contradiction between flexibility and simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the effect setting is switched automatically with performance switching, then the system maintains automatic coordination and reduces manual intervention, but the readjusted effect settings are reset and the performer loses control over customized settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of maintaining customized effect settingsVSAvoidtime to readjust effect settings
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on the relationship between performance information and effect setting information. The controller is configured to switch effect settings only when the performance information changes and the effect setting information is not already switched. This dynamic approach allows the system to automatically coordinate when appropriate while preserving customized settings when needed, eliminating the need for manual readjustment and saving time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the performance switching automatically switches the effect setting to a registered one, then the system maintains pre-configured settings for each performance, but the performer cannot maintain readjusted effect settings across performance switches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to maintain readjusted effect settingsVSAvoidcontrol logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller implements a feedback mechanism by determining whether to switch effect settings based on the selected performance information. The system continuously monitors the relationship between performance selections and effect settings, and only switches effect settings when appropriate. This feedback-based control logic provides the necessary adaptability while keeping the control complexity manageable through clear decision criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11170747B2Sound control device, sound control method and program
Publication Date: 2021.11.09 YAMAHA CORP
  • US11170747B2 patent drawing
  • US11170747B2 patent drawing
  • US11170747B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sound control device includes a selector, a sound signal generator, a switcher, and a controller. The selector is configured to select, based on a user operation, one piece of setting information among a plurality of pieces of setting information including at least one timbre group and one effect setting group. The sound signal generator is configured to generate a sound signal based on performance information and the selected setting information. The switcher configured to switch between a hold-enabled state and a hold-disabled state based on a user operation. The controller configured to control the sound signal generator to generate the sound signal such that in the hold-enabled state, even if the selection of the setting information is switched by the selector, at least the effect setting is maintained.