Sound Input Control Unit for Application-Specific Selective Muting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in managing mute control for sound signals, leading to inconvenience when sound input is undesired but necessary for specific applications, and result in unnecessary sound signal cutoffs.

Innovation Solution

An information processing system with a sound input controlling unit that includes a mixer, mute unit, and switch unit to selectively process and output sound signals based on user instructions and priority settings, ensuring sound signals are only outputted to relevant applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a mute process is performed to prevent sound signal processing when voice input is undesired, then the harmful effect of unnecessary sound processing is reduced, but the sound signal input is cut off even when applications require it, degrading convenience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunnecessary sound processingVSAvoidconvenience of sound input
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the sound signal processing system into multiple independent processing paths, each dedicated to a specific application. The sound input controlling unit includes separate processing channels that can be independently controlled, allowing selective mute functionality per application rather than a global mute that affects all sound processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic control of sound signal processing where the processing state changes based on application requirements and user instructions. The system can dynamically switch between processing and non-processing states for different applications, allowing flexible adaptation to varying needs without permanent or global restrictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If sound signal processing is performed for all applications, then the convenience of sound input is maintained, but sound signals are processed even when not needed, wasting energy and causing echo or muffling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience of sound inputVSAvoidenergy wasted on unnecessary processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the sound processing system into application-specific processing channels, allowing the system to activate only the necessary processing paths. This prevents energy waste on processing sound signals for applications that do not require them, while maintaining processing capability for applications that do need it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the processing parameters (active/inactive state) of sound signal processing based on application requirements. The system adjusts the processing state dynamically, enabling processing only when and where needed, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining convenience for required applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a global mute control is implemented, then the complexity of managing individual application sound settings is reduced, but the ability to provide sound input to specific applications that need it is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of mute control managementVSAvoidadaptability to application-specific sound requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates segmented processing channels for different applications, each with independent control. This segmentation allows the system to manage sound processing on a per-application basis without requiring complex global management, as each channel operates independently based on its specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sound input controlling unit is designed with multi-functionality, capable of handling both global mute operations and application-specific processing simultaneously. This universal design allows the system to provide both simplified global control and detailed application-specific adaptability through a unified interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3961370B1Information processing system, information processing device, method for controlling information processing device, and program
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC
  • EP3961370B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3961370B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3961370B1 patent drawingFigure 4(a)~4(b)

AI summary

An information processing apparatus is connected to a peripheral apparatus that includes sound inputting means for outputting a sound signal representative of sound of surroundings. The information processing apparatus performs control such that, in a case where sound input is required in processing of an application determined in advance, in a state in which a sound signal accepted from the peripheral apparatus is cut off, the sound signal accepted from the peripheral apparatus is accepted and the sound signal is used only in the processing of the application determined in advance.