Sound Source Localization in Closed Test Stands
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current sound source localization methods in closed sound measurement test stands fail to accurately account for reflections on boundary surfaces, leading to inaccurate noise emission analysis in aircraft engines, due to complex calculations and high costs associated with anechoic chambers.
Innovation Solution
A device and method where microphones are arranged in a linear array along the edge of two flat boundary surfaces, allowing for precise consideration of reflections by dividing measured sound pressure by four to correct for interference, and optionally using sound-absorbing surfaces to reduce reflected signal components.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If microphones are arranged in a linear array along the edge of two flat boundary surfaces, then measurement precision is improved by accurately accounting for reflections, but device complexity increases due to specific arrangement requirements
Solution Approach 1:
The patent converts the harmful effect of sound reflections on boundary surfaces into a beneficial measurement tool. By arranging microphones along the edge where two flat boundary surfaces meet, the reflection patterns become predictable and mathematically correctable. The interference patterns created by reflections are used to identify and eliminate reflected signal components, thereby improving sound source localization precision without requiring expensive anechoic chambers.
2Measurement precision
If complex calculations are used to account for reflections on boundary surfaces, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to computational complexity
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating and storing transfer functions that represent the reflection characteristics of the measurement room before actual measurements are taken. These pre-computed transfer functions are then applied during measurement processing, avoiding the need for complex real-time calculations. This approach maintains high measurement precision while significantly reducing the time required for data processing and analysis.
3Measurement precision
If anechoic chambers are used to eliminate reflections, then measurement precision is improved, but manufacturing precision and costs increase due to production requirements
Solution Approach 1:
The patent creates a virtual model of the measurement room's acoustic characteristics through transfer function measurements and calculations. This virtual copy of the room's reflection behavior allows for mathematical correction of reflected signals without requiring physical anechoic treatment. The approach replicates the benefits of an anechoic environment through computational means, avoiding the high costs and manufacturing complexity of building actual anechoic chambers.
4Measurement precision
If sound-absorbing surfaces are used to reduce reflected signals, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of substance increases due to material requirements
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces the mechanical/physical approach of using sound-absorbing materials with a mathematical signal processing approach. Instead of physically absorbing reflected sound waves with materials, the system uses transfer function-based calculations to identify and subtract reflected signal components from the measured data. This substitution eliminates the need for extensive sound-absorbing materials while achieving the same goal of improving measurement precision.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
Enables simpler and more precise sound source localization in closed test stands by accurately accounting for reflections, reducing measurement complexity and costs, and providing complete sound signal information without needing complex calculations for sound-absorbing surfaces.
Implementation Method 1
Microphones for detecting sound measurement signals of a sound field that is generated by the different sound sources of the test specimen
Implementation Method 2
Reflected sound signals due to these reflections can be considered as sound signals from coherent mirror sound sources
Implementation Method 3
Due to an interference between the sound pressure field of the source and the sound pressure field associated with the image sound source
Implementation Method 4
If the two further boundary surfaces are designed to be sound-absorbing, components of the sound signals that are reflected at the two further boundary surfaces are attenuated
Data Source
Figure 1~2
Figure 3~4
AI summary
The device has several microphones (26) that are arranged distanced apart from each other for detection of sound measuring signals of a sound field. An evaluation unit is coupled with the microphones for location of sound sources of the sound field. Two of limitation surfaces are designed in a planar manner and are reverberant. The surfaces are activated together along an edge (19). The microphones are arranged as a linear array (21) along the edge. An independent claim is also included for a method for sound source localization of the sound field of the test specimen in a measuring volume.