Automated Sound Tuning with Delay and EQ Transfer-Function Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual sound tuning in motor vehicles is time-consuming, requires high expertise, and involves complex interactions between multiple parameters, making it difficult to achieve optimal sound quality across all listening positions.

Innovation Solution

An automated sound tuning method using adaptive filters and a control unit to adjust delay lines and equalizing filters, based on measured sound pressure values and a target transfer function, to approximate the desired sound system characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual sound tuning is performed by acousticians using experimental values and trained hearing, then sound quality can be optimized subjectively, but the process becomes time-consuming and requires high expertise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound quality optimizationVSAvoidtuning process duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical adjustment process with an automated electronic system. A computer-controlled system automatically adjusts delay lines, equalizing filters, and other sound system parameters based on measured transfer functions, eliminating the need for manual intervention by acousticians while maintaining optimization quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The sound system performs self-tuning through automated measurement and adjustment. The system measures its own transfer function using microphones at various listening positions, processes the data, and automatically adjusts its parameters without external assistance, enabling the system to optimize itself independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple parameters are adjusted manually to achieve optimal sound impression, then sound quality can be improved, but the complex interactions between parameters make the procedure iterative and require high expertise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound impression optimizationVSAvoidparameter interaction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements closed-loop feedback by measuring the actual transfer function at multiple listening positions and comparing it with target values. Based on the measured deviations, the system automatically adjusts parameters iteratively until optimal sound quality is achieved, eliminating the need for expert manual iteration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically modifies multiple parameters including delay times, filter coefficients, and gain values based on measured transfer function data. The computer-controlled system systematically varies these parameters to optimize the sound field across all listening positions, handling the complex parameter interactions that would be difficult for humans to manage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated tuning methods are implemented, then the tuning process can be simplified and accelerated, but achieving optimal sound quality across all listening positions becomes more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning process efficiencyVSAvoidsound quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the sound optimization task into separate frequency bands using equalizing filters. Each frequency range is independently adjusted based on measured transfer function characteristics, allowing the system to handle complex multi-frequency optimization systematically while maintaining overall sound quality across all listening positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8976974B2Sound tuning system
Publication Date: 2015.03.10 HARMAN BECKER AUTOMOTIVE SYST GMBH
  • US8976974B2 patent drawing
  • US8976974B2 patent drawing
  • US8976974B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for automated tuning of a sound system, the sound system comprising delay lines, equalizing filters, and at least two loudspeakers, the method comprising the steps of reproducing a useful sound signal through the loudspeakers, measuring sound pressure values at least one location, providing a target transfer function for tuning the delay lines and the equalizing filters of the sound system, the target transfer function representing a desired transfer characteristics of the sound system, adjusting the delay of the delay lines, and adjusting amplitude responses of the equalizing filters such, that the actual transfer characteristics of the sound system approximates the target function.