Source Code Prediction from Issue Context and Project History

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing software engineering tools fail to automate the writing of source code that is suitably connected to requirements or specifications, and do not assist developers in predicting and generating accurate source code changes based on issue reports and project history.

Innovation Solution

A system that integrates with software issue trackers and uses a machine-learning model to predict and generate source code changes by learning from project history, issue reports, and specifications, providing suggestions through a streamlined toolchain.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If software tools are used to aid with software engineering tasks, then ease of operation is improved, but extent of automation remains limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidextent of automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the software development system to automatically generate source code changes from issue reports without requiring manual intervention. The machine learning model autonomously analyzes requirements and produces code, making the system serve itself rather than relying on developer input for code generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical coding processes with an automated machine learning-based system. Instead of developers manually writing code based on requirements, the system uses AI models to automatically translate issue reports into source code changes, substituting human mechanical effort with automated intelligent processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual effort is used for translating requirements to source code, then adaptability is maintained, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of code generation from manual text editing to automated machine learning prediction. By transforming the input parameters (issue reports, requirements) through ML models, the system achieves both high productivity through automation and adaptability through the model's ability to handle diverse requirement formats and generate appropriate code structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model serves as an intermediary between requirements and source code generation. It translates natural language issue reports into structured code changes, maintaining adaptability by understanding various requirement formats while improving productivity by automating the translation process without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If code editors provide assistance for source code tasks, then ease of operation is improved, but extent of automation remains limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidextent of automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the software development system to automatically generate source code changes from issue reports without requiring manual intervention. The machine learning model autonomously analyzes requirements and produces code, making the system serve itself rather than relying on developer input for code generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical coding processes with an automated machine learning-based system. Instead of developers manually writing code based on requirements, the system uses AI models to automatically translate issue reports into source code changes, substituting human mechanical effort with automated intelligent processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If software construction tools edit code for consistency, then manufacturing precision is improved, but extent of automation remains limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing precisionVSAvoidextent of automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the software development system to automatically generate source code changes from issue reports without requiring manual intervention. The machine learning model autonomously analyzes requirements and produces code, making the system serve itself rather than relying on developer input for code generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical coding processes with an automated machine learning-based system. Instead of developers manually writing code based on requirements, the system uses AI models to automatically translate issue reports into source code changes, substituting human mechanical effort with automated intelligent processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12619425B2System and method that assists with identifying unpredicted portions of source code files for software engineering tasks
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 LAREDO LABS INC
  • US12619425B2 patent drawing
  • US12619425B2 patent drawing
  • US12619425B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system stores a source code file's changes from a software developer's code editor, for a software engineering task. Upon receiving the code editor's request to predict source code for the source code file, the system retrieves the software engineering task's context data, and transforms the context data to be compatible with the data format used to train a machine-learning model to assist with performing software engineering tasks. The machine-learning model uses the transformed context data to predict the source code for the source code file, with source code file portions corresponding to predicted source code portions. The system identifies each portion of the source code file which is differing from a corresponding portion of the predicted source code, via the code editor. The system commits any differing portions of the predicted source code, which are requested and accepted by the code editor, to the source code file.