Source Mask Optimization for Lithography Defect Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current lithographic projection apparatuses face challenges in accurately reproducing patterns with features smaller than the classical resolution limit, leading to defects and reduced yield due to the difficulty in optimizing source and mask characteristics effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced that involves defining a defect ambit around potential defect locations on a substrate, determining cost functions associated with defect metrics, and adjusting source and mask characteristics using guide functions to optimize the patterning process, thereby reducing defects and improving yield.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional lithographic projection apparatuses are used to reproduce patterns with features smaller than the classical resolution limit, then the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to defects, but the productivity is reduced because effective optimization of source and mask characteristics is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern reproduction accuracyVSAvoidsource and mask optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing source and mask optimization before the actual lithographic patterning process. The method calculates cost functions based on defect metrics and determines guide functions in advance to guide the optimization process, allowing the system to pre-determine optimal source and mask characteristics that will minimize defects in subsequent production runs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using defect metrics from actual or simulated lithographic results to calculate cost functions, which then feed back into the optimization process. The guide functions are determined based on this feedback loop, continuously adjusting source and mask characteristics to reduce defects and improve pattern reproduction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If the lithographic process is optimized to reduce defects, then the manufacturing precision improves, but the loss of time increases due to additional optimization steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect reductionVSAvoidoptimization process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional trial-and-error mechanical optimization approaches with computational methods. By using cost function calculations and guide function determination based on defect metrics, the system substitutes iterative physical adjustments with algorithmic optimization, reducing the time required to achieve defect reduction while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If features are made smaller to increase functional elements per device, then the productivity increases, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to increased difficulty in pattern reproduction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional elements per deviceVSAvoidpattern reproduction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically adjusting source and mask characteristics based on calculated cost functions and guide functions. The optimization process modifies parameters such as source illumination distribution and mask pattern dimensions to maintain manufacturing precision even as feature sizes are reduced to increase the number of functional elements per device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240419086A1Method of determining characteristic of patterning process based on defect for reducing hotspot
Publication Date: 2024.12.19 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US20240419086A1 patent drawing
  • US20240419086A1 patent drawing
  • US20240419086A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for optimizing an aspect of a patterning process based on defects. For example, a method of source and mask optimization of a patterning process includes obtaining a location on a substrate having a threshold probability of having a defect; defining an defect ambit around the location to include a portion of a pattern on the substrate and one or more evaluation points associated with the portion of the pattern; determining a value of a first cost function based on a defect metric associated with the defect; determining a first guide function for the first cost function, wherein the first guide function is associated with a performance metric of the patterning process at the one or more evaluation locations within the defect ambit; and adjusting a source and/or a mask characteristic based on the value of the first cost function, and the first guide function.