Intelligent Sourcing Controller for Supplier Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current supplier selection process is inefficient, requiring buyers to manually search and compare multiple suppliers across various sources, lacking automatic reuse of sourcing criteria, and making it difficult to differentiate and rank potential suppliers effectively.

Innovation Solution

A sourcing engine controller that integrates information from various websites and local data servers, using pre-defined criteria to classify and rank suppliers, providing decision support by synchronizing data and automatically sending RFQs to top-ranked suppliers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If manual supplier search and comparison is used, then buyers can obtain supplier information from multiple sources, but the process is time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupplier information completenessVSAvoidsupplier selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic supplier information collection and comparison through automated web crawlers and data integration, eliminating the need for manual searching. The sourcing controller automatically queries multiple sources, extracts supplier data, and performs comparisons, allowing the system to serve itself rather than requiring buyer intervention for each sourcing task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-collects and stores supplier information from various sources in advance, building a comprehensive supplier database before actual sourcing needs arise. This preliminary data gathering and organization enables rapid supplier identification and comparison when sourcing requests are made, significantly reducing selection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If buyers manually compare suppliers, then they can evaluate supplier suitability, but the process lacks automation and reuse of criteria

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupplier evaluation accuracyVSAvoidsourcing process automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback loops where supplier performance data is continuously collected, evaluated against predefined criteria, and used to refine future sourcing decisions. The sourcing controller automatically compares suppliers based on structured criteria, provides evaluation feedback, and learns from past sourcing outcomes to improve future selections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal sourcing platform that can evaluate suppliers across multiple dimensions (price, quality, delivery, service) using standardized criteria that can be reused across different sourcing projects. The same evaluation framework and data collection mechanisms serve multiple sourcing needs, eliminating the need to recreate evaluation processes for each new sourcing task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If buyers search for suppliers repeatedly using the same criteria, then they can find suitable suppliers, but they cannot automatically reuse sourcing criteria

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupplier selection efficiencyVSAvoidrepeated manual process time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates and stores templates of successful sourcing criteria and evaluation frameworks that can be copied and reused across different sourcing projects. The sourcing controller maintains a library of proven sourcing strategies, supplier lists, and evaluation criteria that can be rapidly replicated for new sourcing needs, eliminating the need to manually recreate these elements each time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Loss of information

If buyers contact multiple potential suppliers, then they can gather information, but differentiation and ranking of suppliers becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupplier comparison dataVSAvoidinformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments supplier information into distinct, standardized categories (price, quality metrics, delivery performance, service capabilities) that can be independently evaluated and compared. The sourcing controller divides complex supplier profiles into manageable data segments, allowing systematic comparison across suppliers without being overwhelmed by information complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8135713B2Sourcing controller
Publication Date: 2012.03.13 SAP SE
  • US8135713B2 patent drawing
  • US8135713B2 patent drawing
  • US8135713B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An intelligent sourcing controller for sourcing potential suppliers from external sources such as the Internet as well as internal sources such as a local data server. The intelligent sourcing engine controller provides a supplier appraisal to the buyer as decision support. The intelligent sourcing controller integrates its supplier appraisal criteria with the buyer's sourcing criteria, classifying the collected information in the same way a buyer configures his requirements for the suppliers. The intelligent sourcing controller synchronizes the Internet sourcing results with the local data server after each search to renew data in the local data server in time and the sourcing criteria can be reused in future for decision support.