SOx Removal in Oxygen-Containing Gases via Reducing Gas Generator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for removing sulfur dioxide and sulfur trioxide from oxygen-containing gases are energy-intensive, complex, and limited by reaction equilibria, leading to inefficiencies and high operational costs.

Innovation Solution

A process involving a reducing gas generator to deplete oxygen from acid gases, producing a hydrogen and carbon monoxide-enriched gas, which is then fed to a direct reduction reactor using a catalyst to convert sulfur species into elemental sulfur, bypassing the Claus reaction equilibrium.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If caustic processes are used to remove sulfur dioxide, then sulfur removal is achieved, but energy consumption for stripping and solvent circulation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur removal efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical/caustic stripping processes with a biological system using sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in a bioreactor. The bacteria naturally oxidize sulfur compounds to sulfate, eliminating the need for energy-intensive mechanical stripping and solvent circulation systems while achieving effective sulfur removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If amine-type solvents are used to absorb SO2, then sulfur dioxide removal is achieved, but selectivity decreases and CO2 absorption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSO2 removalVSAvoidselectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical absorption using amine solvents with a biological oxidation process. The sulfur-oxidizing bacteria specifically target sulfur compounds for oxidation to sulfate, providing high selectivity for SO2 removal without the non-selective CO2 absorption that occurs with amine solvents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If high-temperature operation is used in reducing gas generator, then sulfur removal is improved, but operational complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur removal efficiencyVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operating temperature parameter from high-temperature thermal reduction to moderate-temperature biological oxidation (optimal for bacterial activity, typically 20-40°C). This parameter change maintains effective sulfur removal while dramatically reducing operational complexity and eliminating the need for high-temperature equipment and safety systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If Claus reaction is used for sulfur removal, then sulfur conversion is achieved, but reaction equilibrium limits conversion efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur conversionVSAvoidconversion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the Claus reaction (a chemical equilibrium-limited process) with a biological oxidation process using sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. The bacteria continuously oxidize sulfur compounds to sulfate through metabolic processes that are not constrained by chemical equilibrium, enabling complete or near-complete conversion efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves high sulfur conversion efficiency (at least 85% to 99%) with reduced energy consumption and operational complexity, making the process more economic and efficient.

Implementation Method 1

a reducing gas generator coupled to the source and configured to receive the oxygen-containing acid gas and farther configured to (1) operate under conditions effective to remove oxygen in the oxygen-containing acid gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 2

a direct reduction catalyst disposed in the catalytic reactor, and wherein the catalytic reactor is configured to convert at least one of the plurality of sulfur species to elemental sulfur

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

in a direct reduction reactor in which the sulfur species are reduced to elemental sulfur

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentUS7910077B2Configurations and methods for SOx removal in oxygen-containing gases
Publication Date: 2011.03.22 FLUOR TECH CORP
  • US7910077B2 patent drawing
  • US7910077B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Sulfur oxides are removed from an oxygen-containing acid gas in configurations and methods in which oxygen is removed from the acid gas using reducing gases at relatively high temperature. The so treated acid gas is then fed to a direct reduction reactor in which the sulfur species are converted to elemental sulfur. Contemplated configurations are particularly effective and economically attractive as they are generally not limited by reaction equilibrium as present in a Claus reaction and do not require solvent and solvent-associated equipment.