Soybean Variety A1026436 Breeding Protocol for Yield Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current soybean breeding methods face challenges in developing stable, high-yielding varieties with desirable traits such as disease resistance, drought tolerance, and improved agronomic qualities, as they rely on conventional breeding techniques that are time-consuming and unpredictable, leading to genetic variability and difficulty in replicating superior varieties.

Innovation Solution

The development of the soybean variety A1026436, which is adapted for late group 4 growing regions, involves a specific breeding history and includes methods for crossing with itself or other plants to produce hybrid seeds and plants, utilizing techniques like backcrossing and genetic transformation to introduce desired traits like herbicide resistance and disease resistance, while maintaining the variety's morphological and physiological characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional breeding techniques are used to develop soybean varieties with desirable traits, then genetic variability and unpredictability increase, but the breeding process becomes time-consuming and difficult to replicate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreeding consistencyVSAvoidbreeding cycle duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing a standardized breeding protocol that includes specific parental line selections (A1026436 as recurrent parent), controlled crossing procedures, and defined selection criteria. This predetermined framework allows for consistent replication across different breeding cycles and locations, reducing the time required for each cycle while maintaining reliability through repeatable results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by systematically varying specific breeding parameters such as the choice of parental lines, crossing ratios, and selection intensities. By optimizing these parameters based on performance data from previous cycles, the breeding program achieves both faster cycle times and consistent production of superior varieties with desirable traits like disease resistance and high yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional breeding techniques are used to combine desirable traits from parental germplasm, then trait combination capability improves, but the process becomes unpredictable and difficult to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrait combination capabilityVSAvoidbreeding predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring and evaluating the performance of breeding lines and varieties in controlled trials. Performance data from multiple environments and years are fed back into the breeding program to refine selection criteria and parental line choices. This feedback loop enables predictable combination of desirable traits while maintaining adaptability to different genetic backgrounds and environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the breeding program into distinct, manageable phases: parental line selection, controlled crossing, F1 generation evaluation, F2 generation selection, and variety release. Each phase has specific objectives and criteria, allowing for systematic combination of traits while maintaining control over the breeding process. The segmentation enables reproducible results by standardizing each phase's protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If conventional breeding techniques are used to develop high-yielding varieties, then yield potential improves, but the varieties become less stable across different environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrain yieldVSAvoidenvironmental stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by developing breeding lines and varieties that are designed to perform well across multiple environments and genetic backgrounds. The recurrent parent A1026436 and its progeny are selected for general adaptability while maintaining high yield potential. This multi-functional approach allows the same breeding material to be effectively used in different locations and years, achieving both high productivity and environmental stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes dynamics by creating a flexible breeding program that can adapt to changing environmental conditions while maintaining core breeding objectives. The program dynamically adjusts selection criteria and parental line combinations based on observed performance in different environments. This dynamic approach enables the development of stable, high-yielding varieties that can maintain their performance across varying environmental conditions through continuous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8847026B2Soybean variety A1026436
Publication Date: 2014.09.30 MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC

AI summary

The invention relates to the soybean variety designated A1026436. Provided by the invention are the seeds, plants and derivatives of the soybean variety A1026436. Also provided by the invention are tissue cultures of the soybean variety A1026436 and the plants regenerated therefrom. Still further provided by the invention are methods for producing soybean plants by crossing the soybean variety A1026436 with itself or another soybean variety and plants produced by such methods.