Soybean Variety A1026622 Breeding for Yield and Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current soybean breeding methods face challenges in developing stable, high-yielding varieties with desirable traits such as disease resistance, drought tolerance, and improved agronomic qualities, as they rely on conventional breeding techniques that are time-consuming and unpredictable, leading to genetic variability and difficulty in replicating superior varieties.

Innovation Solution

The development of the soybean variety A1026622, which is adapted for mid-group 2 growing regions, involves specific breeding techniques including bulk selection, single plant selection, and genetic transformation to introduce desired traits like herbicide resistance, disease resistance, and improved nutritional quality, while maintaining the variety's physiological and morphological characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional breeding techniques are used to develop soybean varieties, then genetic diversity and adaptability are improved, but breeding time and unpredictability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenetic diversityVSAvoidbreeding time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-selecting parental lines with desired traits (disease resistance, yield potential, agronomic qualities) before crossing. The breeding program systematically evaluates and selects parents based on specific criteria, preparing the genetic material in advance to reduce subsequent breeding time and improve predictability of outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional breeding techniques are used to develop soybean varieties, then genetic diversity is improved, but variety stability and replicability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenetic diversityVSAvoidvariety stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through systematic evaluation and selection processes at multiple breeding stages. Performance data from field trials, disease resistance assays, and agronomic assessments are continuously monitored and fed back into the selection decisions, ensuring that only lines meeting predetermined stability criteria are advanced, thus improving variety consistency and replicability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple desirable traits are combined in soybean breeding, then variety superiority is improved, but breeding complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariety superiorityVSAvoidbreeding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the breeding program into distinct phases, each targeting specific trait combinations. Different parental lines are selected for different trait profiles (e.g., disease resistance vs. yield vs. agronomic quality), and crossing schemes are structured to systematically combine these traits in manageable steps, reducing overall program complexity while achieving superior multi-trait varieties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8878018B2Soybean variety A1026622
Publication Date: 2014.11.04 MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC

AI summary

The invention relates to the soybean variety designated A1026622. Provided by the invention are the seeds, plants and derivatives of the soybean variety A1026622. Also provided by the invention are tissue cultures of the soybean variety A1026622 and the plants regenerated therefrom. Still further provided by the invention are methods for producing soybean plants by crossing the soybean variety A1026622 with itself or another soybean variety and plants produced by such methods.