Soybean Variety A1036445 Breeding Method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current soybean breeding methods face challenges in developing stable, high-yielding varieties with desirable traits such as disease resistance, drought tolerance, and improved nutritional quality, as they rely on conventional breeding techniques that are time-consuming and unpredictable, leading to the need for innovative approaches to combine multiple desirable characteristics in a single variety.

Innovation Solution

The development of the soybean variety A1036445, which involves crossing and selecting plants to combine traits like disease resistance, herbicide tolerance, and improved nutritional quality, using techniques like backcrossing and genetic transformation to introduce specific loci, enabling the creation of hybrid seeds and plants with enhanced agronomic characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If conventional breeding techniques are used to develop soybean varieties, then the breeding process is simple and requires minimal specialized equipment, but the development time is excessively long and the predictability of desirable traits is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreeding development timeVSAvoidbreeding technique complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-selecting and characterizing parental lines with specific desirable traits (disease resistance, yield potential, nutritional quality) before crossing. This preliminary characterization and selection of parents with known genetic profiles enables more predictable outcomes and reduces the time required for subsequent breeding cycles, as the foundational genetic material is already optimized for the desired traits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through systematic evaluation and selection processes at multiple stages of breeding. Performance data from field trials, disease resistance assays, and compositional analysis are used to feed back into selection decisions for subsequent generations. This feedback loop allows breeders to make informed decisions that accelerate variety development while maintaining predictability of desirable traits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple desirable traits are combined in a single variety, then the overall agronomic performance and nutritional quality improve, but the breeding process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrait combination capabilityVSAvoidbreeding development time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the breeding process into distinct modules: selecting parents for specific traits (e.g., disease resistance in one parent, yield in another), performing targeted crosses, and evaluating progeny for individual and combined traits. This modular approach allows parallel development of different trait combinations and reduces overall development time compared to attempting to combine all traits in a single undifferentiated breeding process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges desirable traits from multiple parental lines into a single soybean variety through controlled crossing and selection. By combining parents with complementary traits (e.g., one parent with disease resistance and another with high yield), the patent achieves varieties that simultaneously express multiple desirable characteristics, improving overall agronomic performance and nutritional quality while managing breeding complexity through systematic trait integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Manufacturing precision

If advanced genetic techniques like genetic transformation are used, then the precision and efficiency of introducing specific traits improve, but the complexity of the breeding process and regulatory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrait introduction precisionVSAvoidbreeding process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses conventional crossbreeding and selection as an intermediary approach to achieve trait introduction without directly applying complex genetic transformation techniques. By using carefully selected parental lines with desired traits and employing systematic crossing and selection protocols, the patent achieves precise trait integration through biological mediation rather than direct genetic engineering, thereby reducing regulatory and procedural complexity while maintaining precision in trait introduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9198379B2Soybean variety A1036445
Publication Date: 2015.12.01 MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC

AI summary

The invention relates to the soybean variety designated A1036445. Provided by the invention are the seeds, plants and derivatives of the soybean variety A1036445. Also provided by the invention are tissue cultures of the soybean variety A1036445 and the plants regenerated therefrom. Still further provided by the invention are methods for producing soybean plants by crossing the soybean variety A1036445 with itself or another soybean variety and plants produced by such methods.