Soybean XB40S13 Trait Integration via Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current soybean breeding processes are time-consuming and resource-intensive, aiming to develop stable, high-yielding varieties with desirable traits such as disease resistance, drought tolerance, and improved fatty acid profiles, but face challenges in efficiently combining these traits in a single variety.

Innovation Solution

The development of the soybean variety XB40S13, which is the result of careful breeding and selection, combining traits like resistance to aerial web blight, aphid antibiosis, and improved fatty acid profiles, through a process involving cross-pollination and backcrossing to achieve homozygosity and phenotypic stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional soybean breeding processes are used to develop varieties with multiple desirable traits, then the variety can achieve comprehensive trait improvement, but the development time becomes excessively long (6-12 years)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive trait improvementVSAvoidbreeding development time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing a structured breeding program with defined objectives, selecting germplasm with desirable traits before the actual breeding begins, and planning multiple generations of crossing and selection in advance. This systematic preparation and forward planning enables the breeding program to efficiently combine multiple traits (disease resistance, drought tolerance, improved fatty acid profiles) while reducing the overall development time from the conventional 6-12 years.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple desirable traits are combined in a single variety through traditional breeding, then the variety achieves comprehensive improvement, but the process becomes resource-intensive and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombination of desirable traitsVSAvoidbreeding process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the breeding program into distinct phases and components: (1) analysis and definition of problems, (2) selection of germplasm with specific traits, (3) crossing and combination of traits, (4) multiple generations of selection and testing, and (5) final variety development. This segmentation allows the complex task of combining multiple traits (disease resistance, drought tolerance, fatty acid profiles) to be managed systematically through organized, manageable steps rather than a monolithic complex process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies universality by designing a breeding program that simultaneously targets multiple traits and objectives within a single integrated framework. The same breeding program structure serves multiple functions: selecting for disease resistance, improving drought tolerance, enhancing fatty acid profiles, and maintaining agronomic characteristics. This multi-functional approach reduces the need for separate breeding programs for each trait, thereby reducing overall process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If conventional breeding methods are used to achieve high yield and stability, then the variety reaches production standards, but the process requires precise planning and efficient resource use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield stabilityVSAvoidbreeding process efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by implementing multiple generations of selection and testing where the performance of breeding lines is continuously evaluated and used to guide subsequent breeding decisions. Feedback from field trials and performance data is used to select the most promising lines for advancement, ensuring that only varieties demonstrating reliable yield stability and desired traits progress through the program. This iterative feedback mechanism improves both reliability and process efficiency by eliminating unsuitable candidates early in the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8921666B1Soybean variety XB40S13
Publication Date: 2014.12.30 PIONEER HI BREED INTERNATIONAL INC

AI summary

A novel soybean variety, designated XB40S13 is provided. Also provided are the seeds of soybean variety XB40S13, cells from soybean variety XB40S13, plants of soybean XB40S13, and plant parts of soybean variety XB40S13. Methods provided include producing a soybean plant by crossing soybean variety XB40S13 with another soybean plant, methods for introgressing a transgenic trait, a mutant trait, and/or a native trait into soybean variety XB40S13, methods for producing other soybean varieties or plant parts derived from soybean variety XB40S13, and methods of characterizing soybean variety XB40S13. Soybean seed, cells, plants, germplasm, breeding lines, varieties, and plant parts produced by these methods and/or derived from soybean variety XB40S13 are further provided.