Computational Space Frame Design for Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for structural aircraft components that reduce overall weight while maintaining mechanical stability and effectively handling stress-induced loads, as conventional designs often require excessive material.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for space frame design that constructs a load stress map, defines attachment and load application points, generates potential space frame designs by culling interconnecting lines based on load stress, and evaluates performance using optimization parameters, incorporating an adaptive dynamics scheme and growth algorithm to optimize for low weight and high mechanical stability, with the resulting design manufactured using additive manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If conventional honeycomb core sandwich structures are used, then structural stability is maintained, but weight is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidstructural performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The space frame structure is divided into multiple individual rods or tubes arranged in a geometric pattern, rather than using a solid honeycomb core. This segmentation allows material to be placed only where structurally necessary, reducing overall weight while maintaining strength through the distributed geometric configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different material properties or cross-sectional characteristics to different rods within the space frame based on their specific load requirements. Each rod can be optimized locally for its function, allowing the overall structure to achieve high strength-to-weight ratio by concentrating material where most needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If more material is used to ensure mechanical stability, then strength is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical stabilityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs iterative computational optimization that dynamically adjusts the configuration, thickness, and material distribution of space frame members based on simulated load conditions. This dynamic optimization process continues until the minimum weight configuration achieving required mechanical stability is found

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention systematically varies critical parameters such as rod diameter, wall thickness, node connectivity, and material composition to find the optimal combination that minimizes weight while satisfying mechanical stability constraints. Parametric modeling allows efficient exploration of the design space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of substance

If conventional design methods are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but material efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs comprehensive structural optimization and design finalization through computational methods before the actual manufacturing process. This preliminary digital prototyping and simulation eliminates the need for iterative physical prototyping, reducing material waste while providing precise manufacturing instructions for fabrication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11640487B2Computer-implemented method for space frame design, space frame construction kit and space frame
Publication Date: 2023.05.02 AUTODESK INC
  • US11640487B2 patent drawing
  • US11640487B2 patent drawing
  • US11640487B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for space frame design involves constructing a load stress map in a geometrical boundary representation of a design space, defining attachment points and load application points in the design space, creating a starting network of interconnecting lines between each two of the attachment points and load application points in the design space, assigning load application factors to each line of the starting network of interconnecting lines based on values of the load stress map, generating potential space frame designs by culling different subsets of lines of the starting network of interconnecting lines for each potential space frame design according to variable culling parameters, evaluating the potential space frame designs with respect to optimization parameters, combining the culling parameters for the potential space frame designs the performance score of which is above a predefined performance threshold, and iterating the steps of generating potential space frame designs and evaluating the potential space frame designs on the basis of the combined culling parameters.