Space Particle Ejection System for Debris Deflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current techniques for deflecting space debris in orbit lack control over particle size, nature, density, flow rate, speed, and trajectory, often requiring large clouds that can generate new debris and pose risks during atmospheric reentry.

Innovation Solution

A particle ejection system with distinct drive means for controlling particle ejection, using a combination of pistons and gas flows to precisely manage the ejection of micro-grains, allowing for controlled, low-speed placement and trajectory modification of particles to deflect debris.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If current techniques are used to generate particle clouds for debris deflection, then large clouds can be formed to deflect objects in orbit, but control over particle size, density, flow rate, speed, and trajectory is lost, and new space debris may be generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle cloud densityVSAvoidparticle size control
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a gas flow as an intermediary medium to transport particles from the storage conduit to the target area. The gas flow acts as a carrier that enables precise control over particle delivery while avoiding direct mechanical ejection mechanisms that would compromise size control and trajectory precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs pneumatic principles by using compressed gas to propel particles through a controlled flow field. This allows for adjustable flow rates and particle velocities while maintaining precise control over particle size and distribution, resolving the contradiction between cloud density and manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Reliability

If large particle clouds are generated to deflect space debris, then collision avoidance capability is improved, but the risk of generating new space debris increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidnew space debris generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of particle ejection by using gas flow instead of mechanical propulsion. This enables control over particle velocity, size, and distribution parameters, ensuring that particles are small enough to burn up in atmosphere yet numerous enough to provide reliable debris deflection through cumulative drag effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The use of an inert gas flow environment prevents chemical reactions and contamination during particle transport and ejection. This ensures particle integrity and prevents the generation of harmful byproducts or new debris from chemical interactions during the deflection process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

3Force

If tungsten particles are used in particle clouds, then debris deflection effectiveness is improved, but atmospheric reentry risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrag force on debrisVSAvoidatmospheric reentry risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the size parameter of particles from large tungsten pieces to fine aerosol-sized particles. This size reduction maintains sufficient drag force through increased surface area to mass ratio while ensuring complete atmospheric burn-up during reentry, eliminating the harmful reentry risk of large dense particles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Quantity of substance

If water particles are used in particle clouds, then debris deflection is achieved, but particle lifetime in space is reduced due to quick sublimation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle cloud maintenanceVSAvoidparticle lifetime in space
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from water to more stable particles such as metal oxides or other space-resistant materials. This maintains the ability to form dense particle clouds for effective debris deflection while extending particle lifetime in the space environment by preventing rapid sublimation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise deflection of space debris by controlling particle ejection parameters, reducing the risk of generating new debris and improving collision avoidance in orbit.

Implementation Method 1

at least one first particle drive means configured to drive the particles flush with the at least one injection orifice

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

at least one second drive means configured to drive the particles outside the at least one storage conduit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

the ejection system comprises at least one first particle drive means configured to drive the particles flush with the at least one injection orifice and at least one second drive means configured to drive the particles outside the at least one storage conduit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow entrainment: Entrainment

Data Source

PatentEP3822176B1System for ejecting particles in space
Publication Date: 2024.03.20 CT INGIE
  • EP3822176B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3822176B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3822176B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a system for ejecting particles (P) into space, comprising at least one particle (P) ejection module (130), at least one particle (P) storage conduit (110) opening at at least one particle (P) injection orifice (120), the particle (P) ejection module (130) being in communication with an external environment (160) to the particle (P) ejection system (100), the ejection system (100) comprising at least one first particle (P) drive means (170) configured to drive the particles (P) to the surface of at least one injection orifice (120) and at least one second drive means (140) configured to drive the particles (P) out of at least one storage conduit (110), the first drive means (170) and the second means of training (140) being distinct.