Space Truss Hip Prosthesis Stem for Bone Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spinal implants with large rims impede bone growth, create stress risers in vertebral endplates, and reduce the effectiveness of bone graft material integration, due to their open channel design which increases pressure on smaller areas and reduces the likelihood of secure bone graft adherence.

Innovation Solution

A spinal implant featuring a web structure with a space truss configuration, comprising multiple planar truss units with struts joined at nodes, designed to distribute forces across multiple planes and facilitate bone growth through openings in the truss structure, while providing a larger surface area for bone graft integration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If large rims with solid material are used to provide contact area, then contact area between implant and vertebral endplates is increased, but bone growth is impeded and the size of the bone column is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact areaVSAvoidbone growth impediment
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The implant uses a porous or lattice-structured rim design instead of solid material, allowing bone ingrowth through the rim structure while maintaining contact area. The porous structure provides pathways for bone cells to penetrate and integrate with the implant, eliminating the bone growth impediment caused by solid rims.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The rim is segmented into a lattice or truss structure with multiple struts and nodes, creating open channels that allow bone growth while distributing the contact area. This segmentation maintains structural integrity and contact area while providing pathways for bone infiltration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Force

If open channel design is used, then compressive forces can be transmitted, but pressure on smaller areas of vertebral endplates increases creating stress risers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompressive force transmissionVSAvoidpressure concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The rim is divided into multiple struts within the open channel design, creating multiple load-bearing pathways. This segmentation distributes the compressive forces across numerous struts rather than concentrating them on small areas, reducing stress risers on the vertebral endplates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lattice structure adds a third dimension to the rim design, creating a three-dimensional network of struts that distributes loads in multiple directions. This dimensional complexity allows force distribution across a larger effective area while maintaining open channel functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If open channel design is used, then structural support is provided, but bone graft material cannot secure itself to the implant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidbone graft adherence
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The porous or lattice-structured rim provides a rough, textured surface that increases mechanical interlocking between the bone graft material and the implant. The porous structure allows bone cells to infiltrate and adhere to the implant surface, securing the bone graft in place while maintaining structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The curved or rounded surfaces of the lattice struts provide better contact area for bone graft material compared to sharp edges. The curved surfaces allow for more uniform distribution of bone graft and improve adhesion through increased surface area and reduced stress concentration points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Reliability

If high-pressure state is applied to bone graft material, then bone graft material can be prevented from exiting and loosening, but creating and maintaining high-pressure environment is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone graft stabilityVSAvoidpressure maintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The porous rim structure provides mechanical retention of bone graft material through friction and interlocking, eliminating the need for high-pressure application. The porous structure naturally retains bone graft particles while allowing for physiological pressure conditions, simplifying the implantation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The implant is designed with pre-formed porous or lattice structures that are ready to receive and retain bone graft material at physiological pressures. The structure is prepared in advance to provide retention without requiring complex high-pressure application equipment or procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2811942B1Prosthetic implant for ball and socket joints
Publication Date: 2018.11.07 4WEB INC
  • EP2811942B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP2811942B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP2811942B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A hip prosthesis includes an acetabular cup and a femoral component comprising a head and a stem, wherein the stem comprises a truss structure, the truss structure comprising a space truss comprising a plurality of planar truss units having a plurality of struts joined at nodes, wherein the web structure is configured to interface with bone tissue.