Space Vehicle Propulsion Using Solid and Electric Thrusters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current space vehicle propulsion systems, relying on liquid-propellant chemical thrusters for high acceleration and electric thrusters for long-duration maneuvers, are costly, complex, and face environmental restrictions, necessitating a more efficient and environmentally friendly solution.

Innovation Solution

A space vehicle equipped with solid-propellant chemical thrusters for high-thrust maneuvers and electric thrusters for long-duration operations, utilizing a shared power and control system to simplify and modularize the propulsion system, reducing complexity and weight while avoiding the drawbacks of liquid propellants.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If liquid-propellant chemical thrusters are used for high acceleration maneuvers, then high thrust levels are achieved, but the system becomes complex, expensive, and environmentally problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethrustVSAvoidpropulsion system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system is segmented into two distinct types: solid-propellant chemical thrusters for high-thrust maneuvers and electric thrusters for low-thrust long-duration maneuvers. This segmentation allows each subsystem to be optimized for its specific function, reducing the overall complexity compared to using liquid-propellant systems for all maneuvers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Solid-propellant thrusters are used as disposable, simple devices that provide high thrust when needed without requiring the complex infrastructure of liquid-propellant systems (pressurized tanks, delivery pipes, pre-heating systems, propellant mixing devices). After use, they are discarded, eliminating the need for complex recovery and reuse systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Force

If liquid-propellant chemical thrusters are used, then high acceleration is achieved, but the system weight increases and payload capacity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccelerationVSAvoidvehicle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system is divided into solid-propellant thrusters for high acceleration events and electric thrusters for sustained maneuvers. Solid thrusters provide the necessary acceleration without requiring heavy pressurized tanks and complex delivery systems, while electric thrusters handle the bulk of maneuvering requirements with minimal weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Solid-propellant thrusters are simple, disposable devices that provide high acceleration when needed without the weight penalty of reusable liquid-propellant systems. They eliminate the need for heavy pressurized tanks, complex piping, and propellant storage systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Force

If conventional liquid-propellant thrusters are used, then high thrust is achieved, but environmental restrictions apply due to toxic propellants

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethrustVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Solid-propellant thrusters use simple, non-toxic propellants that are environmentally friendly compared to conventional liquid propellants like hydrazine. The solid propellants are less toxic and do not require the complex safety systems needed for handling toxic liquid propellants

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Loss of energy

If electric thrusters are used for long-duration maneuvers, then high specific impulse is achieved, but thrust levels become too low for constrained maneuvers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecific impulseVSAvoidthrust
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system is segmented by assigning electric thrusters to long-duration, low-constraint maneuvers where high specific impulse is the priority, while solid-propellant thrusters handle short-duration maneuvers requiring high thrust. This segmentation allows each system to operate in its optimal performance range

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The combination of solid and electric thrusters provides efficient and cost-effective propulsion, enabling a range of maneuvers with reduced environmental impact and increased payload capacity, while simplifying the propulsion system and reducing toxicity.

Implementation Method 1

solid-propellant chemical thrusters... provide a range of thrust comparable to that of liquid-propellant chemical thrusters

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

electric thrusters produce thrust by accelerating and injecting charged particles, in particular ions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric propulsion: Electromagnetic Propulsion

Data Source

PatentUS10442558B2Space vehicle with electric propulsion and solid propellant chemical propulsion
Publication Date: 2019.10.15 GERAKL
  • US10442558B2 patent drawing
  • US10442558B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A space vehicle (1), in particular a satellite or a probe, capable of executing high-thrust maneuvers or high specific impulse maneuvers. According to the invention, the space vehicle (1) includes at least one solid-propellant chemical thruster (10-14) and at least one electric thruster (20-24).