Spacecraft Attitude Control Using SDRE for Nonlinear Disturbances

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing attitude control systems for spacecraft are defective due to uncertainties and nonlinearities, making them inefficient and prone to suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

The use of an optimal regulator derived from the State-Dependent Riccati Equation (SDRE) technique, which allows for real-time determination of optimal trajectories and control laws, autonomously adapting to unmodeled disturbances and system nonlinearities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional linear control techniques (LQR, PID) are used for spacecraft attitude control, then the control system is simple to implement, but the system performance deteriorates due to nonlinearities and uncertainties in spacecraft dynamics

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEase of implementationVSAvoidControl performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the fixed-parameter linear control approach into a variable-parameter nonlinear control approach. The State-Dependent Riccati Equation (SDRE) method continuously adapts the control parameters based on the current system state, allowing the controller to optimize performance for each operating condition while maintaining mathematical tractability through the Riccati framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static linear control to dynamic nonlinear control by formulating the control law as a differential game where the value function satisfies a Hamilton-Jacobi-Isaacs (HJI) equation. This dynamic formulation allows the control strategy to adapt in real-time to changing system conditions, nonlinearities, and uncertainties, improving reliability while maintaining implementation feasibility through structured solution methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If predefined trajectories with feed-forward terms are used for LQR control, then the system can track desired trajectories, but the system becomes vulnerable to fortuitous deviations and requires complex linearization at multiple operation points

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTrajectory tracking accuracyVSAvoidSystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent emphasizes feedback-based control through the differential game formulation and value function approach. Rather than relying on open-loop feed-forward trajectories, the control law continuously uses state feedback to adjust control inputs, making the system robust to deviations while avoiding the complexity of multiple linearization points. The feedback structure naturally handles nonlinearities and uncertainties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The SDRE-based differential game controller is self-adapting, automatically adjusting its control strategy based on the current system state without requiring external trajectory re-planning or manual intervention. The value function computation inherently accounts for the current operating conditions, allowing the system to self-correct from deviations and maintain optimal performance across varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stability of the object's composition

If Lyapunov-derived control laws are used for nonlinear systems, then stability can be proven, but the control laws are difficult to tune and may heavily tax the actuators

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveStability proofVSAvoidTuning difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical tuning process of Lyapunov controllers with an automated mathematical optimization framework based on differential games and value functions. Instead of manually adjusting controller parameters to achieve stability, the HJI-based formulation automatically generates optimal control laws that guarantee stability while optimizing performance criteria, eliminating the need for difficult manual tuning and reducing actuator stress through optimal control allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12202628B2Attitude control system and method
Publication Date: 2025.01.21 URUGUS SA
  • US12202628B2 patent drawing
  • US12202628B2 patent drawing
  • US12202628B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and method for controlling the attitude maneuvers of a spacecraft in space are provided. The method automatically generates optimal trajectories in real-time to guide a spacecraft, providing a much more robust and efficient method than predefined trajectories, to model errors or disturbances. These methods do not rely in predefined trajectories and their associated feed-forward term. The systems comprise sensors, attitude control mechanisms, and a control module to orient the spacecraft in real-time, such that the spacecraft reaches a desired target attitude following an optimal path in the state space and is locally and asymptotically stable.