Additive Spacecraft Panel Structure With Truss Core and Low Thermal Impedance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spacecraft panel manufacturing methods, particularly using composite sandwich-structure panels, face challenges such as high thermal impedance, high cost, and labor-intensive processes, along with inefficiencies in additive manufacturing due to unsupported features, warping, and cracking.

Innovation Solution

The development of additively manufactured spacecraft panels featuring a truss structure connecting two skins, printed as a single unit without joints or seams, allowing for self-supporting truss members and integrated features like localized reinforcement and thermal management, using materials like laser-sintered metal alloys for improved thermal performance and reduced manufacturing time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If composite sandwich-structure panels are used, then structural strength is improved, but thermal impedance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidthermal impedance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the core structure and skin panels into a single integrated additively manufactured unit, eliminating the need for separate bonding operations. This integration removes the thermal impedance introduced by adhesive layers while maintaining the sandwich structure's strength benefits through the truss-based core design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameter from composite materials requiring adhesives to metal alloys that can be directly fused through additive manufacturing. This parameter change eliminates the thermal barrier effect of bonding agents while preserving structural integrity through controlled material deposition and fusion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional composite manufacturing methods are used, then structural panels are produced, but manufacturing time and labor cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple manufacturing operations into a single additive manufacturing process. The core structure, skin panels, and localized reinforcement features are all produced in one continuous build operation, eliminating sequential steps such as tooling removal, ply placement, and multiple curing cycles required by conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary design integration during the modeling phase, incorporating all structural features, reinforcement zones, and skin attachments into a single digital model before manufacturing. This preliminary action ensures that no post-processing or assembly operations are needed, significantly reducing manufacturing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If separate parts are attached for localized features, then functional requirements are met, but expense and labor increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalized feature capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges localized reinforcement features, shielding elements, and skin attachments directly into the core structure during additive manufacturing. These features are integrated as part of the single build process, eliminating the need for separate parts and post-assembly operations while maintaining design flexibility and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient, cost-effective production of lightweight, thermally efficient spacecraft panels with integrated structural features, reducing manufacturing time and eliminating the need for post-processing, while enhancing resistance to thermal loads and environmental stresses.

Implementation Method 1

the granular raw material may include for example thermoplastic polymer, metal powder, metal alloy powder, or ceramic powder, which may be fused using a computer-controlled heat source, such as a scanning laser or scanning electron beam. Exemplary methods include selective laser melting (SLM)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective Laser Melting: Laser Beam Welding

Implementation Method 2

Exemplary methods include selective laser melting (SLM), direct metal laser sintering (DMLS)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDirect Metal Laser Sintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 3

Exemplary methods include selective laser melting (SLM), direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), selective laser sintering (SLS), fused deposition modelling (FDM), and electron beam melting (EBM)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron Beam Melting: Electron Beam

Data Source

PatentUS11794927B2Additively manufactured spacecraft panel
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 THE BOEING CO
  • US11794927B2 patent drawing
  • US11794927B2 patent drawing
  • US11794927B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of additively manufacturing a spacecraft panel includes printing a first skin and a second skin, spaced apart from the first skin. The method further includes printing a first truss structure connecting the first skin to the second skin.