Spaced Pivot Assembly for Surgical Forceps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dual-action jaw sets for surgical instruments often lose mechanical advantage as they close due to central pivot pins and actuation mechanisms that align on centerline, limiting the force applied during grasping or cutting operations.

Innovation Solution

A push-to-close actuated, dual-action, spaced pivot assembly with two separate moving jaws that pivot about fulcrum points on opposite sides of the centerline, maximizing crank angle and force by positioning pivot and drive force points far apart, allowing for simultaneous jaw movement and enhanced cutting or grasping capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a central common pivot pin is used for both jaws, then the structure is simplified and easier to manufacture, but the mechanical advantage is limited due to restricted crank arm distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejaw assembly structureVSAvoidmechanical advantage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the single central pivot into two separate spaced pivot fulcrum points, one for each jaw. This segmentation allows each jaw to have its own pivot location optimized for mechanical advantage while maintaining structural simplicity through the shared jaw retaining body.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pivot points are positioned in a spaced arrangement transverse to the centerline of the jaw retaining body, moving from a single-point (0D) or collinear (1D) arrangement to a distributed (2D) configuration. This dimensional change maximizes the crank arm distance between pivot and drive force points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If link arms are used to connect center pivoting jaws to actuation drive, then jaw movement is achieved, but mechanical advantage is lost as jaws close and components align on centerline

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejaw actuationVSAvoidmechanical advantage during closing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs asymmetric positioning of the pivot fulcrum points relative to the jaw geometry and drive force application points. This asymmetric arrangement ensures that the crank arm maintains an optimal angle throughout the jaw closing motion, preventing alignment on the centerline that would eliminate mechanical advantage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The spaced pivot configuration enables dynamic optimization of the crank angle during jaw actuation. As the jaws close, the geometry maintains favorable force transmission angles, allowing the system to adaptively preserve mechanical advantage throughout the motion range rather than losing it at the closing position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Force

If pivot points are positioned far apart, then maximum crank angle and jaw force are achieved, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejaw closing forceVSAvoidjaw assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the support function for both spaced pivot points into a single integrated jaw retaining body. This consolidation allows the pivot points to be positioned far apart for maximum mechanical advantage while avoiding the structural complexity of two separate mounting structures, as both pivots are accommodated within one unified component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design provides maximum force leverage and efficient tissue cutting and grasping, enabling reliable biopsy and surgical procedures, particularly suited for delicate tissues like heart and lung biopsies, with a locking mechanism to securely hold and remove tissue samples.

Implementation Method 1

by positioning the pivot point fulcrum and drive force point as far away from each other as the structure allows, the maximum crank angle at any point of the jaw actuation is produced, to maximize the force of the jaws

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS9844389B2Push-to-close actuated dual action spaced pivot assembly for surgical instrument jaws, blades, and forceps
Publication Date: 2017.12.19 MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC
  • US9844389B2 patent drawing
  • US9844389B2 patent drawing
  • US9844389B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A push-to-close actuated, dual-action, spaced pivot, assembly for jaws, blades, and forceps devices. The assembly is structured for use with a push rod, cable, or solid wire forceps actuator surgical instrument. A jaw receiving body of the assembly is adapted to receive a wide variety of types of jaws performing different surgical functions. Two separate moving jaws each pivot about a separate spaced pivot pin, on opposite sides of the jaw body centerline. A handle with a pushing actuating rod provides a pushing motion to a drive rod, cable, or solid wire within a cable sheath to push a connected yoke in the assembly to push against the jaws to close the jaws together.