Intervertebral Spacer Cam Mechanism for Precise Rotation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surgical devices and methods for implanting intervertebral spacers between vertebral bodies are inadequate in efficiently maintaining spacing and promoting fusion, as they lack effective mechanisms for precise placement and rotation during spinal fixation procedures.

Innovation Solution

An intervertebral spacer with a cam surface that rotates about a pivot point when engaged with a complementary cam lobe on an inserter tool, facilitated by a chamfered surface and threading for easy alignment and insertion, allowing for controlled pivoting and stabilization between vertebral bodies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional surgical devices are used for implanting intervertebral spacers, then the procedure can be performed, but precise placement and rotation control are inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement precisionVSAvoidrotation control
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cam mechanism serves as an intermediary between the surgeon's manual input and the spacer's rotation/positioning. The cam surface and cam lobe convert linear pushing motion into controlled rotational movement, providing both precision and ease of operation without requiring complex robotic systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static positioning to dynamic controlled rotation. The cam mechanism allows the spacer to rotate dynamically during insertion, enabling precise angular adjustment while maintaining ease of operation through simple linear pushing motion on the inserter tool

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If a cam mechanism is added to the inserter tool, then rotation control and placement precision are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation precisionVSAvoidinserter tool complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inserter tool is segmented into distinct functional components: the cam lobe for rotation control, the shaft for insertion, and the handle for operation. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently while keeping the overall design relatively simple and manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cam mechanism utilizes curved cam surfaces and lobes to convert linear motion to rotational motion. This geometric approach provides precise rotation control through simple curved surfaces rather than complex mechanical linkages, maintaining ease of manufacture and operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Ease of operation

If the cam surface is made rotatable against a complementary cam surface, then frictional forces are reduced and insertion is facilitated, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion easeVSAvoidcam surface precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cam surfaces are pre-formed with precise geometries during manufacturing to ensure proper engagement and rotation. This preliminary precision in manufacturing the cam surfaces and lobes eliminates the need for complex adjustment mechanisms during surgery, facilitating ease of operation while maintaining reasonable manufacturing precision requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables precise placement and rotation of intervertebral spacers, reducing frictional forces and enhancing the fusion process by utilizing a cam mechanism that aids in the insertion and stabilization of spacers between vertebral bodies, thus improving the efficacy of spinal fixation procedures.

Implementation Method 1

a cam surface that is rotatable against a complementary cam surface of an inserter tool such that a first force causes the intervertebral spacer to pivot, relative to the inserter tool, about a pivot point associated with the cam surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Data Source

PatentEP3829493B1Spinal surgery systems
Publication Date: 2024.10.30 GETSET SURGICAL SA
  • EP3829493B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3829493B1 patent drawingFigure 1C~1D
  • EP3829493B1 patent drawingFigure 1E~1F

AI summary

An intervertebral spacer may include a superior surface configured to engage a superior vertebral body, an inferior surface configured to engage an inferior vertebral body, and a peripheral wall extending from the superior surface to the inferior surface. A proximal end of the peripheral wall may include with a cam surface that is rotatable against a complementary cam surface of an inserter tool such that a first force causes the intervertebral spacer to pivot, relative to the inserter tool, about a pivot point associated with the cam surface.