SPAD Detector Array with Segmented Detection Areas for Ranging Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Single photon avalanche diode (SPAD) devices face accuracy issues due to the pile-up effect when receiving strong returned light, leading to ranging inaccuracy, especially in scenarios with highly reflective objects or short distances, as the dead time prevents immediate response to subsequent photons, causing saturation and inaccurate reflectance evaluation.

Innovation Solution

A detector module with a detector array comprising pixel groups of first and second ranging pixels, each with distinct detection regions of different areas, coupled with processing units and digital processing units to generate time of flight signals and perform statistical computing, thereby improving resistance to strong light and ambient conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a pixel detector array with large effective area is used to receive returned photons, then the detection capability is improved, but the pile-up effect occurs causing ranging inaccuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidranging accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The detector array is segmented into multiple pixel groups with different detection area ratios. Each pixel group contains first ranging pixels with larger detection areas and second ranging pixels with smaller detection areas, allowing differentiated response to photon intensity levels and mitigating the pile-up effect across the entire array.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the detector array are assigned different detection area ratios to optimize local performance. Pixel groups with higher proportions of second ranging pixels (smaller detection area) are positioned to receive strong returned light, while pixel groups with more first ranging pixels (larger detection area) handle weaker signals, creating local optimization throughout the array.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If the SPAD detects strong returned light, then the detection sensitivity is improved, but the dead time causes the SPAD to be unable to react immediately to subsequent photons

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoiddead time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The pixel detector array is divided into multiple pixel groups with different detection area ratios, allowing parallel processing of detection tasks. While some pixel groups process strong signals that trigger dead time, other pixel groups continue detecting weaker signals, effectively reducing the overall dead time impact on measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses pixel groups with smaller detection areas (second ranging pixels) that can process signals more quickly with shorter dead times, providing partial detection capability that compensates for the excessive dead time in pixel groups with larger detection areas during strong light conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Quantity of substance

If the pixel sensor array receives photons with higher intensity, then the detection capability is improved, but the histogram pile-up causes the detection time to be less than the actual one

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephoton detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection time accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The detector array is segmented into pixel groups with different detection area ratios, creating multiple detection channels with different response characteristics. This segmentation allows the system to resolve the histogram pile-up effect by comparing detection times across different pixel groups, thereby recovering accurate detection time information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the detection time information from pixel groups with smaller detection areas as feedback to correct the detection times from pixel groups with larger detection areas. This feedback mechanism compensates for the histogram pile-up effect and restores accurate ranging measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Quantity of substance

If a large detection area is used, then the photon collection capability is improved, but the reflectance evaluation becomes saturated due to strong returned light

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephoton collection capabilityVSAvoidreflectance evaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The detector array is segmented into pixel groups with different detection area ratios, allowing the system to evaluate reflectance using multiple detection channels with different saturation characteristics. This segmentation prevents single-point saturation and enables robust reflectance measurement through aggregation of unsaturated pixel group data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detection area parameter across different pixel groups to optimize reflectance measurement. By having pixel groups with varying detection area ratios, the system can adjust the effective detection parameter to match the intensity level of returned light, preventing saturation while maintaining accurate reflectance evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances measurement accuracy by mitigating the pile-up effect, providing accurate depth information and immune to sunlight and ambient light interference, allowing for precise characterization of different environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

Single photon avalanche diode (SPAD) may detect single photon even in low light scenarios due to its high sensitivity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSingle photon avalanche diode detection: Avalanche Breakdown

Implementation Method 2

The detector array receives the returned light to generate the detection signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20240219531A1Detector module and ranging device
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 SEER MICROELECTRONICS INC
  • US20240219531A1 patent drawing
  • US20240219531A1 patent drawing
  • US20240219531A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A detector module and a ranging device are provided. The detector module includes a detector array including a plurality of pixel groups each of which has a plurality of ranging pixels. A first pixel group of the pixel groups includes a plurality of first ranging pixels each of which includes a first detection region. A second pixel group of the pixel groups includes a plurality of second ranging pixels each of which includes a second detection region. Area of the first detection region and area of the second detection region are different from each other. The ranging device provides higher accuracy due to difference area of the first detection region and the second detection region of the detector module.