Multi-Stage Spammer Profile Detection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing online connection network systems face challenges in accurately identifying and distinguishing spammer profiles, which can lead to illicit activities and damage trust within the professional community, with existing solutions being resource-intensive and ineffective in large-scale implementations.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage machine learning approach comprising a content-based, connection graph, and behavior-based model is employed to evaluate member profiles, connections, and activities, using TF-IDF and SVM or deep learning algorithms to generate scores that indicate the likelihood of a profile being a spammer profile, with a profile detector, connection detector, and behavior detector working sequentially to minimize false positives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing spam detection solutions are applied to online connection networks, then spam detection capability is improved, but resource consumption increases and effectiveness decreases in large-scale implementations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespam detection capabilityVSAvoidresource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The spam detection system is divided into multiple specialized detectors (profile detector, connection detector, behavior detector) that each handle specific aspects of spam identification. This segmentation allows the system to process different types of data independently and efficiently, reducing overall resource consumption while maintaining comprehensive detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies detection mechanisms selectively rather than uniformly to all profiles. By focusing computational resources on profiles that exhibit suspicious characteristics detected by initial filters, the system achieves effective spam detection without processing every profile at full depth, thereby improving resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive spam detection analysis is performed on all member profiles, then detection accuracy is improved, but false positives increase and processing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The detection process is segmented into multiple stages with specialized detectors. The profile detector, connection detector, and behavior detector each contribute to the final determination, allowing the system to cross-validate findings and reduce false positives while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detection results from one detector inform the operation of subsequent detectors. This feedback loop allows the system to adjust its analysis based on preliminary findings, improving accuracy while avoiding unnecessary processing that could lead to false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If multiple detection models are deployed to improve spam identification, then detection capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespam identification capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses segmentation to organize multiple detection models into distinct, specialized detectors with clear responsibilities. This modular architecture improves spam identification capability through diverse detection approaches while managing complexity by keeping each detector focused on specific detection tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system is designed with universal components that can handle multiple detection tasks. The detectors are built to work together in a coordinated manner, allowing the system to achieve comprehensive spam identification capability while avoiding the complexity of completely separate detection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11089048B2Identifying spammer profiles
Publication Date: 2021.08.10 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US11089048B2 patent drawing
  • US11089048B2 patent drawing
  • US11089048B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spammer profile detector uses multi-stage machine learning approach, where a content-based machine learning model, a connection graph machine learning model, and a behavior-based machine learning model are used sequentially, each model generating a score indicating the likelihood that a profile is a spammer profile. The content-based machine learning model examines and evaluates information stored in a member profile. The connection graph machine learning model examines and evaluates a member's connections. The behavior-based machine learning model examines and evaluates activities of a member represented by a member profile. The score produced by the spammer profile detector can be used to determine whether the profile should be flagged as a spammer profile, whether the profile should be omitted when determining a count of the total number of active member profiles within the system, whether the profile should be restricted or removed from the system, etc.