Spanner Manufacturing Using Flat Blank Cold Forging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for making spanners, such as hot and cold forging, result in high material waste, lengthy processing times, and increased costs due to the need for complex heating processes and heavy stamping presses.

Innovation Solution

A method involving preparing a flat metal blank, forging and pressing it to form a head and shank with arch-shaped parts, followed by trimming to remove scrap and create finished holes, using simpler machines like heading and forming machines, and optional heat treatment to reduce waste and processing time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If hot forging is used to make spanners, then the metal blank can be shaped more easily, but the processing cost increases due to heating machines and the processing time increases due to heating and cooling steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of shapingVSAvoidcomplexity of heating machines
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temperature parameter from high (hot forging) to room temperature (cold forging), eliminating the need for heating machines while maintaining formability through proper tooling design. The metal blank is forged cold instead of hot, fundamentally changing the thermal state parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the thermal system (heating machines, furnaces) with a purely mechanical system (forging presses, dies). The shaping capability previously achieved through thermal softening is now achieved through mechanical force application during cold forging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If cold forging with thick round metal blank and round heads is used, then the spanner can be formed, but a heavy stamping press with much larger power output is required, increasing equipment cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformability of spannerVSAvoidpower output of stamping press
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary forming of the head and shank structures before the final stamping operation. By pre-shaping the metal blank into a closer approximation of the final form, the material thickness and density are reduced, requiring less force for the subsequent stamping operation and allowing the use of lighter presses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the forming process into multiple stages: initial forging of head and shank, intermediate shaping, and final stamping. This segmentation allows each stage to work on progressively smaller and lighter material, reducing the cumulative power requirement compared to a single heavy stamping operation on thick stock.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional hot forging or cold forging methods are used, then spanners can be manufactured, but material waste increases and processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturability of spannerVSAvoidamount of scrap metal
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the blank geometry parameter from round cross-section to flat rectangular cross-section. This parameter change allows the metal to be more efficiently formed into the final spanner shape with minimal material removal, significantly reducing scrap compared to starting with round blanks that require extensive material removal to achieve the flat spanner profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method reduces material waste, shortens processing time, and decreases manufacturing costs by using simpler machines and minimizing scrap removal, enabling efficient mass production of spanners.

Implementation Method 1

forging and pressing a part of the flat metal blank for forming a head and forming a shank which is forged and extended outwards from the head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 2

pressing the head and the shank end again to remove scrap or redundant metal projecting from their arch-shaped parts and punch respective finished holes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentUS9463503B2Method of making a spanner
Publication Date: 2016.10.11 CHEN MING CHANG
  • US9463503B2 patent drawing
  • US9463503B2 patent drawing
  • US9463503B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of making a spanner comprises the steps of preparing a flat metal blank, forging and pressing a part of the metal blank to form a head and a shank whose width is smaller than a width of the head, pressing the head to form a first arch-shaped part, pressing a shank end of the shank to expand the shank end and then form a second arch-shaped part, and pressing the head and the shank end again to remove redundant scrap projecting from the first arch-shaped part and the second arch-shaped part and also punch finished holes in the head and the shank end respectively, thereby completing the finished spanner. Accordingly, the method reduces the waste of the material and the processing cost, decreases the use frequency of high-cost machines and promotes the processing efficiency by using the flat metal blank.