3D Printed Spare Component Procurement Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current component procurement methods for long-term use equipment, such as construction machines and railways, face challenges with delivery time and durability, particularly when using recycled or new components, as they are not satisfactory in maintaining quick and reliable quality maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A management system that combines procurement of components using a 3D printer with genuine components, where a processor simulates molding a spare component using a 3D printer and evaluates its durability, determining its applicability until a genuine component is procured, thereby optimizing component procurement by comparing the two.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a genuine component is procured through traditional channels, then the component has high durability and reliability, but the procurement time is long and delivery is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent durabilityVSAvoidprocurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation and evaluation of 3D-printed spare components before actual failure occurs. By pre-assessing the durability and applicability of alternative components through virtual molding simulation, the system prepares viable replacement options in advance, enabling rapid deployment when failure occurs without waiting for traditional procurement channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital copy or virtual model of the genuine component and uses it to simulate the molding process for producing spare components. This virtual copying allows evaluation of spare component quality without requiring physical prototypes, significantly reducing assessment time while maintaining reliability standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Loss of time

If a spare component is manufactured using a 3D printer on demand, then the procurement time is reduced and equipment restoration is faster, but the component durability and quality may be insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestoration timeVSAvoidcomponent durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary simulation and evaluation of 3D-printed spare components before actual failure occurs. By pre-assessing the durability and applicability of alternative components through virtual molding simulation, the system prepares viable replacement options in advance, enabling rapid deployment when failure occurs without waiting for traditional procurement channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where simulation results of spare component molding are continuously evaluated against genuine component standards. The evaluation feedback loop compares key durability parameters and provides guidance for optimizing the 3D printing process, ensuring that rapidly produced spare components meet minimum reliability thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If only genuine components are used for procurement, then the quality and reliability are ensured, but the procurement flexibility and responsiveness to sudden failures are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent qualityVSAvoidprocurement flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal procurement framework that can handle multiple component types and procurement scenarios through a single integrated platform. The determination module can evaluate both genuine and spare components using the same simulation and assessment procedures, providing flexible procurement options while maintaining consistent quality standards across different component sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts procurement strategies based on real-time conditions such as component availability, urgency of replacement, and simulation results. Rather than following a fixed procurement protocol, the system can adaptively select between genuine components and 3D-printed spares, optimizing both reliability and responsiveness to varying operational needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If component procurement relies solely on traditional channels, then the process is simple and straightforward, but the delivery time is long and cannot meet urgent maintenance needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocurement process simplicityVSAvoidmaintenance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service procurement where the determination module automatically evaluates component options, simulates molding parameters, and determines applicability without requiring extensive manual intervention. This automated self-assessment capability maintains process simplicity while dramatically accelerating procurement speed, allowing urgent maintenance needs to be addressed efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for quicker restoration of equipment by using 3D-printed spare components until genuine components are available, improving procurement efficiency and reducing downtime, while ensuring the spare components' durability meets practical use requirements.

Implementation Method 1

simulate molding a spare component using a 3D printer

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effect3D Printing: 3D Printing

Data Source

PatentUS20240386157A1Management system and management method
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 PROTERIAL LTD
  • US20240386157A1 patent drawing
  • US20240386157A1 patent drawing
  • US20240386157A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a management system that manages procurement of a component of a product, the management system including a simulator that simulates molding the component using a 3D printer by a processor executing a program stored in a memory, wherein the simulator is configured to: calculate an evaluation of a spare component; and determine whether the spare component is applicable to the product until a genuine component is procured by comparing procurement of the spare component with procurement of the genuine component based on the evaluation, and present the applicable spare component.