Automotive Spare Tire Collision Management System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Spare tires within motor vehicles pose a challenge during collisions as their column strength can hinder the vehicle's ability to absorb collision energy by crushing axially, and existing methods do not effectively prevent the spare tire from participating in energy absorption.

Innovation Solution

A combination tire deflator and wheel retainer system that rapidly deflates the spare tire and secures the wheel to the compartment surface upon axial displacement, using a unitary structure with a cutter and hook portion to prevent the spare tire from relocating during an impact event.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the spare tire is left intact and mounted in the compartment, then it provides structural support and protects against floor deformation, but it participates in collision energy absorption through plastic deformation which reduces the vehicle's overall crash energy management effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection of fuel tankVSAvoidcollision energy absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically deflating the spare tire before the main collision impact occurs. The deflation mechanism is triggered by initial impact forces or acceleration changes, reducing the tire's structural integrity and column strength in advance, so that during the subsequent main impact, the deflated tire does not participate in energy absorption through plastic deformation, thereby improving overall crash energy management effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the spare tire is allowed to move freely during impact, then it can be quickly deflated and restrained, but it may relocate within the compartment causing unpredictable behavior during collision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeflation speedVSAvoidrestraint control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism - a retainer device with restraining arms - that actively controls the spare tire's position during impact. This intermediary structure mediates between the deflation process and the tire's movement, ensuring the tire remains in a controlled position within the compartment while being deflated, preventing unpredictable relocation and allowing the deflation system to operate effectively without interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a separate deflation and restraint system is used, then the functions are well-defined, but the device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunction definitionVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the deflation mechanism and the restraint mechanism into a single integrated assembly. The deflation system uses a cutter element that simultaneously serves as part of the restraint structure, while the restraint arms are positioned to both control tire movement and guide the deflation process. This integration reduces device complexity and minimizes space requirements while maintaining well-defined functions for both deflation and restraint operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively prevents the spare tire from participating in collision energy absorption by quickly deflating and restraining it within the compartment, ensuring the vehicle can manage crash energy without excessive deformation and requiring minimal space without external control devices.

Implementation Method 1

the cutter portion will compress and impinge upon, and then cut through, the tire

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

cut through, the tire before the hook portion of the combination cutter and hook assembly engages the wheel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFracture: Fracture Mechanics

Implementation Method 3

the hook portion will cooperate with the hold down mechanism to maintain the spare tire in its stowed position during the impact event

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Fastening: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 4

a body structure displaces the spare tire in the event of an impact directed axially against the compartment and having sufficient force to deform the compartment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact Force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS7731257B2Collision management system for compartment-mounted automotive spare tire
Publication Date: 2010.06.08 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US7731257B2 patent drawing
  • US7731257B2 patent drawing
  • US7731257B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A collision management system for an automotive spare tire includes a pneumatic spare tire mounted upon a wheel, and a body structure for axially displacing the spare tire in the direction of a combination tire deflator and wheel retainer which engages the spare tire and pierces it to deflate the spare tire, while subsequently locking upon the wheel rim, so as to assist in retaining the spare tire in a desired location within a storage compartment of the vehicle.