Lightning Spark Gap Assembly for Power Follow Current Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional solutions for triggering fusible links in lightning protection spark gaps are inadequate for detecting erroneous power follow currents, as they are based on current and voltage levels that are similar to transient pulse loads, making it difficult to distinguish and disconnect before overloading occurs.

Innovation Solution

An indicator device is electrically connected to the diverging electrodes or quenching chamber to capture the power follow current profile, allowing for spatial and temporal separation from pulse currents, enabling quick activation of the bridge igniter within milliseconds, thus preventing overloading by disconnecting during both pulse and power follow currents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional triggering solutions based on current and voltage levels are used, then the fusible link can be activated by transient pulse loads, but it cannot distinguish between pulse currents and erroneous power follow currents, making it impossible to disconnect before overloading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to detect erroneous power follow currentsVSAvoidcomplexity of current and voltage level monitoring
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the monitoring function into two independent indicator devices: one for pulse current detection and one for power follow current detection. Each indicator device monitors a specific current type through dedicated electrical connections, allowing the system to distinguish between pulse currents and power follow currents without complex differentiation logic, thereby improving reliability while maintaining simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If the indicator device is connected to monitor power follow current, then spatial and temporal separation from pulse currents is achieved, but the device complexity increases due to additional electrical connections and monitoring circuits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision in capturing power follow current profileVSAvoidcomplexity of electrical connections and monitoring circuits
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates separate indicator devices for different current types, with each device having its own electrical connections tailored to monitor specific current characteristics. This segmentation allows precise measurement of power follow current profiles without the complexity of trying to extract this information from a single composite monitoring system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The indicator devices serve as intermediary components that bridge the gap between the complex electrical environment of the spark gap and the simple binary decision needed for fusible link activation. These intermediaries convert complex current profiles into clear activation signals, improving measurement precision while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the bridge igniter is activated quickly within milliseconds, then overloading is prevented, but the activation must be delayed until pulse currents have subsided to avoid false triggering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection against overloadingVSAvoidtime delay before bridge igniter activation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses separate indicator devices for pulse current and power follow current detection, allowing independent monitoring without interference. This segmentation enables the system to wait for pulse currents to subside (avoiding false triggering) while still detecting power follow current errors quickly, optimizing both reliability and response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The indicator devices are prepared in advance to monitor their respective current types continuously. When an error condition is detected, the system can activate the bridge igniter with minimal delay because the monitoring is already in place and ready to trigger, reducing loss of time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If a single indicator device monitors both pulse current and power follow current, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to distinguish between current types and activate the bridge igniter at the correct time is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of indicator devicesVSAvoidprecision in distinguishing current types
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs separate indicator devices for pulse current and power follow current monitoring, prioritizing measurement precision over device simplicity. Each indicator device is optimized to detect specific current characteristics, ensuring accurate distinction between current types and enabling timely bridge igniter activation, even though this increases the number of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for delay-free activation of the bridge igniter in case of erroneous power follow currents, ensuring the lightning protection spark gap is disconnected before overloading, even in the presence of pulse currents, thereby protecting the system from excessive loads.

Implementation Method 1

An indicator device is electrically connected to the diverging electrodes or quenching chamber to capture the power follow current profile

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

activation of the bridge igniter... allowing for quick activation of the bridge igniter within milliseconds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11764570B2Lightning protection spark gap assembly and method for operating a lightning protection spark gap assembly
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 DEHN SOHNE GMBH CO KG
  • US11764570B2 patent drawing
  • US11764570B2 patent drawing
  • US11764570B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a lightning protection spark gap assembly. The lightning protection spark gap assembly comprises: a lightning protection spark gap (1); a safety fuse device (8) which can be triggered by a bridge initiator (7) and which is connected between a first or second voltage line (S1, S2) and a corresponding main connection (1, 1b) of the lighting protection spark gap (1); and an indicator device (4′) for detecting a secondary current flow connecting to a pulse current flow or a corresponding portion of the secondary current flow, and for triggering the safety fuse device (8) by activating the bridge initiator (7) when the detected secondary current flow or the corresponding portion of the secondary current flow fulfills a first predefined criterion, wherein the lightning protection spark gap (1) has a first and a second divergent electrode (21a, 21b) and an arcing chamber (25), and wherein the indicator device (4′) is electrically connected to the first or second divergent electrode (21a, 21b) and/or the arcing chamber (25) in such a way that it detects the secondary current flow or the corresponding portion of the secondary current flow in the area (L) in which the secondary current arc flows.