Spark Plug Insulator Crack Prevention via Cross-Sectional Ratio

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Spark plugs in highly efficient internal combustion engines face issues with insulator cracks due to high stress and thermal shocks at the boundary between the insulator nose length portion and tapered portion, leading to reduced mechanical strength and potential overheating.

Innovation Solution

A spark plug design with a specific configuration that includes a male thread portion with a diameter of M12 or less, a cross-sectional area ratio of 2.80 ≤ C/B ≤ 3.50 to manage heat dissipation, and additional features such as a middle barrel portion and glass seal positioning to distribute stress and prevent thermal shocks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the insulator diameter is reduced to achieve spark plug downsizing, then the spark plug size is reduced, but the wall thickness becomes small leading to increased susceptibility to thermal shock and mechanical stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespark plug sizeVSAvoidinsulator wall strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The insulator is designed with different diameter portions (narrower diameter portion and wider diameter portion) creating local variations in wall thickness. The narrower diameter portion has greater wall thickness to resist thermal shock and mechanical stress, while the wider diameter portion accommodates the metal shell. This local quality variation allows the insulator to maintain overall compact size while having locally reinforced sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The insulator is segmented into multiple diameter portions along its axial direction. The boundary portion between the narrower diameter portion and wider diameter portion is specifically designed to be positioned away from the glass seal portion, creating distinct functional zones that can independently handle different stress and thermal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Power

If the boundary portion between insulator nose length portion and tapered portion is subjected to high stress and thermal shock in highly efficient engines, then engine efficiency is improved, but insulator cracks occur due to decreased mechanical strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine efficiencyVSAvoidinsulator integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The boundary portion between the narrower diameter portion and wider diameter portion is specifically designed with increased wall thickness compared to other sections. This local reinforcement positions the boundary away from the glass seal portion, creating a zone with higher mechanical strength that can withstand the high stress and thermal shock conditions in highly efficient engines without cracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Temperature

If heat is transmitted from the tapered portion to the shoulder portion for dissipation, then heat dissipation is improved, but rapid cooling causes thermal shock to the tapered portion and nearby regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipationVSAvoidthermal shock
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The insulator is divided into distinct diameter portions with the boundary between the narrower diameter portion and wider diameter portion positioned away from the glass seal portion. This segmentation creates thermal zones with different cooling rates, allowing the tapered portion to dissipate heat to the metal shell while the boundary portion maintains structural integrity by being thermally isolated from the most rapidly cooling region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively suppresses insulator cracks by maintaining mechanical strength and preventing overheating, thereby enhancing durability and reliability in high-stress engine environments.

Implementation Method 1

the heat of the insulator, by being transmitted from the tapered portion to the shoulder portion of the metal shell, is dissipated to the engine side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

a large thermal shock is applied to the tapered portion and the region positioned close thereto. As a result of this, there is concern that, due to a large thermal shock being applied thereto, an insulator crack occurs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal shock: Thermal Shock

Data Source

PatentEP2597737B1Spark plug
Publication Date: 2020.01.08 NITERRA CO LTD
  • EP2597737B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2597737B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2597737B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

With a spark plug reduced in diameter, a crack of an insulator in the boundary between an insulator nose length portion and a tapered portion is more reliably prevented, thus realizing a superior durability. A spark plug includes an insulator and a metal shell. The insulator includes an insulator nose length portion positioned in a leading end portion, and a tapered portion, extending from the rear end of the insulator nose length portion toward a rear end side, increased in diameter toward the rear end side. The metal shell includes a shoulder portion, protruding inward in a radial direction, having a retaining surface by which the tapered portion is retained, and a male thread portion positioned on the outer peripheral side of the shoulder portion, and the thread diameter of the male thread portion is set to M12 or less. When the area of a cross section of the insulator, perpendicular to an axis, passing through the boundary between the insulator nose length section and tapered portion is B (mm2), and the area of a cross section of the metal shell, perpendicular to the axis, passing through the leading end of the retaining surface is C (mm2), 2.80 ≤C/B ≤3.50 is satisfied.