Semiconductor Spark Plug Testing via Water Meniscus Arc Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for a reliable and cost-effective method to test semiconductor spark plugs used in aircraft turbomachines to distinguish between operational and defective plugs, as existing methods are inefficient and may incorrectly identify serviceable plugs as defective or vice versa.

Innovation Solution

A method involving depositing water on the spark plug head between the electrodes, applying an operating voltage, and identifying characteristics of the electric arcs induced, such as the number or dispersion of arcs, to determine the plug's operational status, which can be implemented using a turbomachine ignition box.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple replacement method is used when starting failure occurs, then the response time is fast and operation is simple, but the reliability of determining plug status is low leading to high error ratio

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of replacementVSAvoidaccuracy of determining plug status
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing a functional test of the spark plug before final replacement decisions are made. The method involves applying voltage to the plug, depositing water on the insulator, and observing arc behavior to determine if the plug is truly defective or still serviceable. This preliminary testing step prevents premature replacement of functional plugs while ensuring defective ones are identified, thus resolving the contradiction between simple replacement operation and reliable status determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If extensive testing is performed to ensure accurate determination of plug status, then the reliability of testing is improved, but the complexity of the testing process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of determining plug statusVSAvoidcomplexity of testing process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback by using optical sensors to detect the presence and characteristics of electric arcs, then using this information to determine plug status. The system observes whether arcs form and how they behave (including whether they are repelled by water deposited on the insulator), and feeds this information back to automatically determine if the plug is operational or defective. This automated feedback mechanism achieves high reliability without requiring complex manual testing procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses water as an intermediary substance to test the spark plug's functionality. By depositing water on the insulator head and observing how the electric arc interacts with the water (whether it forms, how it behaves, and whether it is repelled), the system can determine plug status without requiring complex testing equipment. The water acts as a simple, effective mediator that reveals the plug's operational state through observable arc behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If traditional testing methods without water are used, then the testing process is simple, but the ability to discriminate between functional and defective plugs is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of testing processVSAvoiddiscrimination ability between functional and defective plugs
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing water as a variable condition during the testing process. The method compares arc behavior under two conditions: with water deposited on the insulator head and without water. This parameter change (adding water) significantly enhances the discrimination ability between functional and defective plugs, as operational plugs will have arcs repelled by the water while defective plugs will not show this behavior. The simple act of adding water creates a clear distinguishable difference in test results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method efficiently discriminates between functional and defective spark plugs, reducing errors and ensuring safety without environmental pollution, and can be used for both new and used plugs, optimizing the testing process.

Implementation Method 1

depositing water on the head between the two electrodes, such that the water forms a meniscus covering the semiconducting element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 2

When a sufficient voltage is applied between the two electrodes, air present in the air gap becomes ionised and thus contributes to the formation of an electric arc between the two electrodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonisation: Ionisation

Implementation Method 3

the formation of an electric arc between the two electrodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric arc: Electric Arc

Implementation Method 4

Due to the surface polarisation of the semiconductor, the arc 'sticks' to the semiconductor independently of the surrounding pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface polarisation: Polarisation

Data Source

PatentUS10855058B2Method for testing a semiconductor spark plug
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US10855058B2 patent drawing
  • US10855058B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In order to test a semiconductor spark plug, a test method comprises a step consisting of depositing water on the head of the spark plug, between the two electrodes of same, so that the water forms a water meniscus covering the semiconductor element of the head, a step consisting of applying, between the first terminal and the second terminal of the spark plug, a voltage equal to the operating voltage of the spark plug, a step consisting of identifying at least a first characteristic of electric arcs induced between the electrodes during the application of the voltage, and a step consisting of determining the operational or defective character of the spark plug according to the first characteristic of the electric arcs. This test method is particularly reliable and does not require constraining provisions in order to ensure the safety of the operators implementing the method.