Sparse Linear Operation Graphs for GPU Interior Point Execution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional Interior Point Methods for solving linear programs are laborious and resource-intensive, necessitating the development of a novel, efficient method that can be executed on Central Processing Units (CPUs) with accelerated computing co-processors like GPUs or TPUs.

Innovation Solution

A novel Interior Point Method algorithm optimized for GPUs or TPUs, transforming linear operations into graphs and iteratively optimizing them for specific hardware characteristics such as topological depth, memory footprint, and cache hierarchy utilization, enabling efficient execution on parallel processing hardware.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If Traditional Interior Point Methods are used to solve linear programs, then mathematical programming can be performed, but the process becomes laborious and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution speedVSAvoidresource intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the linear program into a chain of linear operations, where each operation is represented as a node in a graph. This segmentation allows the complex computation to be divided into smaller, manageable units that can be processed in parallel on GPU or TPU hardware, significantly improving execution speed and reducing resource intensity compared to traditional monolithic Interior Point Methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the traditional sequential computation approach into a parallel dimension by representing operations as a graph structure. This dimensional change enables simultaneous execution of multiple linear operations on GPU/TPU hardware, converting a laborious sequential process into an efficient parallel computation that maintains mathematical correctness while dramatically improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If linear operations are represented as graphs and optimized for parallel hardware, then execution speed improves, but algorithm complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution speedVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the representation parameters of linear operations from traditional matrix forms to graph-based node-edge structures. This parameter change enables the operations to be optimized for parallel hardware execution while maintaining mathematical equivalence. The graph representation allows for iterative optimization of topological depth and memory access patterns, improving execution speed without requiring complex manual algorithm design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a system where the linear operation graph automatically optimizes itself by iteratively improving topological depth and memory access patterns. The algorithm self-adjusts the graph structure to minimize cache misses and maximize parallel hardware utilization, reducing the need for complex external optimization and simplifying the overall system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If iterative optimization of linear operation graphs is performed, then execution characteristics improve, but computation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution efficiencyVSAvoidoptimization time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by representing linear operations as graphs before execution and iteratively optimizing the graph structure in advance. This preliminary optimization of topological depth and memory access patterns ensures that when the actual computation runs on GPU/TPU hardware, the execution is highly efficient. The iterative optimization happens before the main computation, so the optimization time is amortized over many subsequent efficient executions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuity of useful action by implementing iterative optimization that continuously improves the linear operation graph structure. Each iteration refines the graph to better exploit parallel hardware capabilities, and this continuous improvement process is integrated into the execution flow. The useful action of optimizing execution characteristics is performed continuously alongside the main computation, ensuring that time is not lost but rather productively utilized

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250390325A1System and method for efficient execution of fused sparse linear operations on highly-parallel processing hardware
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 KINAXIS INC
  • US20250390325A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390325A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390325A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A platform that includes a plurality of CPU cores and a plurality of GPU cores that receive input of a chain of linear operations; represent or transform each linear operation in the chain to a respective linear operation graph; connect one or more input nodes of each component in the chain to one or more output nodes of a previous component in the chain, with an edge of weight one; iteratively optimize the linear operation graph, thereby improving one or more characteristics of each linear operation graph; map the linear operations graph into a runtime execution plan that is tailored for a specific processing hardware; iteratively optimize the runtime execution plan, thereby improving one or more specific processing hardware execution characteristics; and run the runtime execution plan that has been optimized on the specific processing hardware.