Sparse Ordered Iterative Multi-Antenna Channel Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing channel estimation methods for OFDM and SC-FDMA systems with multiple antennas suffer from interpolation and extrapolation errors, especially at low pilot densities, leading to inaccurate channel impulse response estimates.

Innovation Solution

The Sparse Ordered Iterative Multi-Antenna Channel Estimation (SOI-MA-CE) method iteratively finds significant delay taps of an intermediate channel impulse response estimate and adds them to an error measure to form a sparse ordered channel estimate, improving the accuracy of channel impulse response estimation by iteratively processing until a predetermined number of iterations is reached or a stopping criterion is satisfied.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional frequency-domain channel estimation with interpolation is used, then the method is simple to implement, but interpolation and extrapolation errors increase at low pilot densities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidchannel impulse response estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the channel impulse response into significant delay taps and non-significant components. By identifying and separately processing only the significant delay taps (those with energy above a threshold), the method achieves accurate channel estimation without requiring dense pilot patterns or complex interpolation across all frequency tones. This segmentation allows sparse sampling while maintaining estimation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the essential channel characteristics by identifying significant delay taps from the received signal. Instead of using all frequency domain information with interpolation, the method extracts only the prominent multipath components (significant delay taps) and uses them to reconstruct the channel impulse response, thereby eliminating interpolation errors while maintaining implementation feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If high pilot density is used to reduce interpolation errors, then channel estimation accuracy improves, but signal bandwidth and transmission efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel estimation accuracyVSAvoidsignal bandwidth occupation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the significant delay tap information from the received signal, ignoring the majority of frequency tones that do not contribute meaningfully to channel characterization. This extraction approach allows accurate channel estimation with sparse pilot patterns, as the method focuses computational resources on identifying prominent multipath components rather than densely sampling the entire frequency spectrum.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of pilot density from high to low by fundamentally altering the estimation approach. Instead of relying on dense frequency sampling with interpolation, the method uses a threshold-based detection scheme that identifies significant delay taps regardless of pilot density, thereby achieving accurate channel estimation with minimal pilot overhead and maximized transmission efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If iterative processing is performed to improve channel estimation accuracy, then estimation precision increases, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel impulse response estimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the iterative processing into distinct stages: initial channel estimate acquisition, significant delay tap identification, error calculation, and refined estimate generation. By dividing the computational task into these discrete segments with clear stopping criteria (when error falls below threshold or maximum iterations reached), the method achieves high estimation accuracy while maintaining controllable computational complexity through early termination when convergence is achieved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by calculating the error between consecutive iterative estimates and using this error information to guide further processing. The iterative loop continues only as long as the error exceeds a threshold, providing automatic termination when sufficient accuracy is achieved. This feedback mechanism ensures high estimation precision while avoiding unnecessary computational iterations, thereby balancing accuracy with complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3130119B1Sparse ordered iterative group multi-antenna channel estimation
Publication Date: 2020.07.22 ALTIOSTAR NETWORKS INC
  • EP3130119B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3130119B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3130119B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Data can be received characterizing a first signal transmitted in an orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) system by a transmitter with one or more transmit antennas through a wireless channel and received by a receiver with a plurality of receive antennas, the first signal including a plurality of pilot pulses. A final estimated channel impulse response of the wireless channel can be determined for each pair of transmitter and receiver antennas by iteratively finding one or more significant delay taps of an intermediate channel impulse response estimate and adding the one or more significant delay taps to an error of the intermediate channel impulse response estimate. Data characterizing the final estimated channel impulse response can be provided. Related apparatus, systems, techniques, and articles are also described.