Sparse Range Processing for Vehicle Radar Sidelobe Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing PMCW radar systems face challenges with high dynamic range requirements and intolerance to Doppler frequency shifts, leading to sidelobe levels that obscure weak objects and limit object detection precision.

Innovation Solution

A correlator design for PMCW CDMA MIMO radar systems utilizing the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) optimization formulation, combined with iterative solvers like ISTA and ADMM, to exploit signal sparsity and improve range processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional correlator operation is used in PMCW radar systems, then the system can process radar signals, but sidelobe levels increase which obscures weak objects and limits detection precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection precisionVSAvoidsidelobe levels
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the processing parameters by applying sparse recovery methods (LASSO optimization, ISTA, ADMM) instead of conventional correlator operations. This transforms the range processing approach to exploit signal sparsity, thereby reducing sidelobe levels and improving detection precision simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the conventional mechanical correlator operation with an optimization-based sparse recovery system. By substituting the traditional signal processing mechanism with LASSO optimization and iterative solvers, the system achieves lower sidelobes and better detection precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If PMCW radar systems operate with high dynamic range requirements, then they can detect a wide range of object strengths, but the system becomes intolerant to Doppler frequency shifts which limits robustness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic rangeVSAvoidintolerance to Doppler frequency shifts
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the signal processing parameters by implementing sparse recovery methods that are inherently more robust to Doppler frequency shifts. The LASSO optimization framework and iterative solvers (ISTA, ADMM) process signals in a manner that maintains dynamic range capability while tolerating Doppler variations better than conventional correlators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If conventional range processing is used, then the system operates with standard complexity, but object detection precision is limited due to sidelobe interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection precisionVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional range processing mechanics with sparse recovery-based processing. By substituting traditional correlator operations with LASSO optimization and iterative solvers, the system achieves superior detection precision despite increased computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the processing approach by exploiting signal sparsity as a key parameter. This sparsity-exploiting method improves detection precision by reducing sidelobe interference, accepting the trade-off of more complex optimization-based processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed approach significantly reduces sidelobe levels, enhancing the dynamic range and precision of object detection, enabling robust detection of both strong and weak objects.

Implementation Method 1

A radar system, such as a civil automotive radar system, transmits an electromagnetic signal and receives back reflections of the transmitted signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The time delay and/or time delay variation between the transmitted and received signals can be determined and used to calculate the distance and/or the speed of objects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler effect: Doppler Effect

Implementation Method 3

receives back reflections of the transmitted signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS20250291047A1Sparse range processing for vehicle radar system
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 NXP BV
  • US20250291047A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291047A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291047A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A radar system includes transmitter modules configured to transmit radar signals and receiver modules. A controller is configured to encode a plurality of code division multiplexed radar, cause the plurality of transmitter modules to transmit the plurality of code division multiplexed radar signals as transmitted signals, receive reflections of the transmitted signals reflected by at least one object to generate signals based on the received reflections as observed signals, wherein a sparse matrix defines a relationship between the plurality of transmitter codes and values of the observed signals, execute a sparse recovery method to determine the sparse matrix, which is associated with distance estimates based on the observed signals, using the predefined code dictionary and the observed signals, estimating an attribute of the at least one object using the sparse matrix, and transmitting the attribute of the at least one object to a vehicle driver assistance system.