Sparse-Routed Magnetic Coils for Wireless Power Charging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wireless charging systems face inefficiencies in coil-to-coil efficiency due to parasitic resistance and self-capacitance losses, leading to energy waste, heat dissipation, and potential health risks from electromagnetic radiation.

Innovation Solution

A sparse routing coil structure with optimized turn spacing and width is designed, reducing parasitic resistance and self-capacitance by increasing turn spacing between wire turns, and a method to determine these parameters through simulation to maximize coil-to-coil efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional tight routing coil structure is used, then coil area is minimized, but parasitic resistance loss increases and charging efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparasitic resistance lossVSAvoidcoil area
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the coil structure by introducing turn spacing between adjacent wire turns. This parameter modification increases the turn-to-turn distance, which reduces parasitic capacitance and resistance losses while maintaining acceptable coil area through optimized spacing ratios (W/S ≤ 10).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different spatial characteristics to different regions of the coil by introducing localized spacing between turns rather than uniform tight routing. This creates regions of reduced electromagnetic coupling between adjacent turns, lowering parasitic effects in critical areas while maintaining overall coil functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If tight routing coil structure is used, then manufacturing is simplified, but self-capacitance loss increases and charging efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-capacitance lossVSAvoidcoil manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the geometric parameters by introducing controlled turn spacing S between adjacent wire turns. This parameter change reduces self-capacitance losses by increasing distance between conductive elements, while the spacing follows design rules (W/S ≤ 10) that maintain manufacturability through standardized fabrication processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional coil structure is used, then power transfer is achieved, but electromagnetic radiation increases causing health concerns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectromagnetic radiation exposureVSAvoidpower transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the spatial arrangement parameter by introducing turn spacing between wire turns, which reduces electromagnetic radiation by increasing distance between current-carrying conductors. This parameter modification lowers electromagnetic field intensity while maintaining power transfer efficiency through optimized spacing that balances radiation reduction with inductive coupling requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potentially harmful effect of electromagnetic radiation by using turn spacing to reduce field intensity. The spacing that would seem to reduce coupling is actually optimized to minimize radiation exposure while maintaining sufficient power transfer, effectively transforming a harmful effect into a safety benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The sparse routing coil structure enhances coil-to-coil efficiency by reducing resistive losses and increasing self-resonant frequency, thereby minimizing energy waste and electromagnetic radiation, improving overall charging efficiency and safety.

Implementation Method 1

energy is transferred from one or more power transmitter (TX) coils to one or more power receiver (RX) coils through magnetic coupling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic coupling: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The loss that affects the coil-to-coil efficiency includes the coil-to-coil loss, parasitic resistance loss of the TX and RX matching capacitors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParasitic resistance: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 3

parasitic resistance and self-capacitance losses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-capacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS10878991B2Sparse-routed magnetic coils for wireless power charging system
Publication Date: 2020.12.29 CHENGDU CONVENIENTPOWER SEMICON CO LTD
  • US10878991B2 patent drawing
  • US10878991B2 patent drawing
  • US10878991B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sparse routing coil structure for a magnetic coil in a wireless charging system is disclosed. The sparse routing coil structure may include a magnetic coil routed by turns of a wire and a turn spacing S between adjacent turns of the wire. The turn spacing S may be a space between adjacent turns of the wire, and a turn width is denoted as W. A ratio of W/S may be not larger than 10.