Sparse Structural Elements for Morphological Signal Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing signal processing methods based on mathematical morphology face challenges in reducing calculation amount and time, especially in noisy environments, and require hardware support for speed improvements.

Innovation Solution

A signal processing method using sparse structural elements and a multi-stage or two-stage sparse algorithm, along with dissociative structural elements and bipolar morphological gradients, to reduce calculation and enhance gradient amplitude.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional morphological filtering is used in noisy environments, then filtering performance is improved, but computational complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltering performanceVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the structural element into a kernel part and a soft edge part, where the kernel provides strong filtering capability and the soft edge provides noise robustness. This segmentation allows the algorithm to achieve good filtering performance without requiring the full computational complexity of traditional soft morphology, as the kernel can be processed more efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces sparsity parameter to characterize the structural element, transforming the traditional dense structural element into a sparse one. By changing the density parameter of the structural element, the algorithm achieves both noise robustness and reduced computational complexity, as sparse structures require fewer operations while maintaining filtering effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If fast computing methods for morphological operations are used, then processing speed is improved, but algorithm complexity increases or hardware support is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and utilizes only the essential computational components of morphological operations by using sparse structural elements. By taking out the core filtering function and removing redundant computations associated with dense structures, the algorithm achieves faster processing speed without requiring complex hardware support or sophisticated fast algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The sparse structural element acts as a simplified, computationally inexpensive version of traditional structural elements. It provides the necessary filtering functionality with much lower computational cost, making it a 'cheap' alternative that doesn't require expensive hardware acceleration or complex algorithmic optimizations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If dense structural elements are used for morphological filtering, then filtering effectiveness is improved, but calculation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltering effectivenessVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making different parts of the structural element have different densities. The kernel part maintains high density for effective filtering, while the soft edge part uses sparsity for computational efficiency. This local differentiation allows the algorithm to achieve good filtering effectiveness without the uniform computational burden of dense structures throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The sparse structural element applies partial action by using only the necessary portions of the structural element for effective filtering. Rather than processing all points in a dense structure, the sparse structure processes only critical points, achieving sufficient filtering effectiveness with reduced calculation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230161836A1Signal processing method based on mathematical morphology with sparse structural elements
Publication Date: 2023.05.25 SOUTH CHINA UNIV OF TECH
  • US20230161836A1 patent drawing
  • US20230161836A1 patent drawing
  • US20230161836A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A signal processing method based on mathematical morphology with sparse structural elements is disclosed, including the steps of: 1) building sparse structural elements; 2) performing morphological filtering on a signal by using the sparse structural elements; 3) improving a filtering effect for a filtering result by using a multi-stage sparse algorithm or a two-stage sparse algorithm; 4) building dissociative structural elements and a bipolar morphological gradient; and 5) performing a bipolar morphological gradient extraction on the signal by using the dissociative structural elements. The method can effectively reduce the calculation amount and calculation time of mathematical morphology signal processing and enhance the amplitude of the morphological gradient.