Sparsity-adaptive equalization for mmWave MU-MIMO

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Millimeter wave (mmWave) massive MU-MIMO systems face challenges in reducing hardware complexity and power consumption due to high propagation losses and the need for fine-grained beamforming, especially with all-digital architectures, which often result in performance degradation and increased preprocessing complexity.

Innovation Solution

A sparsity-adaptive equalization system, known as SPADE, that adaptively disables multiplier circuits based on threshold values for the input signals and weighting values, reducing the number of multiplications required for spatial equalization and thereby lowering power consumption and implementation complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If all-digital architectures with low-resolution data converters are used, then spectral efficiency is improved and RF circuitry is simplified, but baseband processing complexity and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral efficiencyVSAvoidbaseband processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and exploits the sparsity property inherent in mmWave channels to separate significant multiplications from negligible ones. By identifying and removing redundant multiplications (those involving near-zero channel coefficients), the system reduces baseband processing complexity while preserving spectral efficiency benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the processing parameter from fixed full-precision multiplication to adaptive sparsity-aware multiplication. By dynamically adjusting the number of multiplications based on channel sparsity characteristics, the system reduces computational complexity while maintaining performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the number of base station antennas is increased for fine-grained beamforming, then propagation losses are compensated, but hardware complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropagation loss compensationVSAvoidhardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential multiplications needed for effective beamforming by identifying non-negligible channel coefficients. This reduces the number of active multiplier circuits while maintaining the beamforming capability needed to compensate for propagation losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different processing quality to different antenna elements based on their channel coefficient magnitudes. High-priority multiplications involve significant coefficients, while low-priority ones involve near-zero coefficients that can be skipped, creating local quality differentiation in processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If conventional equalization algorithms are used, then equalization performance is maintained, but power consumption increases due to excessive multiplications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequalization performanceVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates redundant multiplications by detecting near-zero channel coefficients. This reduces the number of active multiplier circuits and associated power consumption while preserving equalization performance through the remaining essential multiplications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing only the necessary multiplications rather than all possible multiplications. By executing a subset of multiplications (those with significant coefficients) and skipping others (those with near-zero coefficients), the system reduces power consumption while maintaining adequate equalization performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11979207B2Sparsity-adaptive equalization for communication systems
Publication Date: 2024.05.07 CORNELL UNIVERSITY
  • US11979207B2 patent drawing
  • US11979207B2 patent drawing
  • US11979207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless communication system can include an antenna and an equalization system. The antenna can be configured to wirelessly receive a data signal from a user equipment (UE). The equalization system can be configured to compensate for distortion incurred by the data signal during propagation. The equalization system can include a set of multiplier circuits. Each multiplier circuit can include a first input, a second input, a multiplier device, and a management circuit. The first input can receive a first input signal that corresponds to the data signal. The second input can receive a second input signal that corresponds to a weighting value assigned to a channel associated with the antenna. The multiplier device can be enabled or disabled. When enabled, the multiplier device can be configured to perform a multiplication operation on the first input signal and the second input signal. When disabled, the multiplier circuit may not perform the multiplication operation. The management circuit can be configured to selectively disable or enable the multiplier device based on the first input signal and/or the second input signal, thereby reducing an effective number of multiplications and offering power savings.