Spatial Audio Gain Control for Clipping Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spatial audio reproduction techniques face challenges with fixed gain processing, leading to issues like unnecessary headroom and audio clipping, especially when dealing with varying sound levels and dynamics, and require manual or iterative gain control, which is inconvenient and introduces delays in real-time applications.

Innovation Solution

A method that estimates signal energy and spatial audio parameters to determine a maximum output energy across channels, deriving a gain value to adjust sound reproduction gain, ensuring optimal dynamic range utilization and preventing clipping, while maintaining low computational burden and no additional delay.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If fixed gain processing is used in spatial audio reproduction, then the processing chain is simple and fast, but it causes unnecessary headroom or audio clipping when sound levels and dynamics vary

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidaudio quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from fixed gain processing to dynamic gain control. The system calculates time-varying gain values based on the energy of input audio signals and spatial audio parameters, allowing the gain to adapt continuously to changing sound levels and dynamics. This resolves the contradiction by making the gain processing dynamic rather than static, preventing both headroom waste and clipping while maintaining processing efficiency through closed-form solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the gain parameter from a fixed constant to a time-varying value calculated from signal energy and spatial parameters. By deriving gain values that adapt to the actual audio content characteristics (energy levels, spatial distribution), the system optimizes dynamic range utilization in real-time, avoiding the quality issues of fixed gain while maintaining computational efficiency through direct calculation methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If manual or iterative gain control is implemented to avoid headroom and clipping, then audio quality improves, but device complexity and processing delay increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio qualityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically calculating optimal gain values based on its own processing of the input signal. The gain calculation uses the energy of the input audio signals and spatial audio parameters that are already being computed for spatial rendering, eliminating the need for external manual control or separate iterative adjustment processes. This self-contained approach improves audio quality without adding external complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by calculating the gain values in advance as part of the spatial audio processing pipeline, before the final rendering stage. By deriving gain values from signal energy and spatial parameters during the spatial analysis phase, the system prepares optimized gain settings proactively, avoiding the need for subsequent iterative adjustments or manual intervention, thus reducing overall processing complexity and delay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If manual or iterative gain control is used, then audio clipping is prevented, but real-time performance is degraded due to additional delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaudio qualityVSAvoidprocessing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent ensures continuity of useful action by integrating gain calculation into the continuous spatial audio processing stream. The gain values are computed continuously alongside spatial parameters from the input signals, maintaining an uninterrupted flow of optimized audio processing. This eliminates gaps or iterative cycles that would introduce delays, ensuring real-time performance while continuously preventing clipping through adaptive gain control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary gain calculation as part of the initial spatial audio processing stage, determining optimal gain values before the rendering phase. By computing gains from signal energy and spatial parameters upfront, the system eliminates the need for post-processing adjustments or iterative refinement, thereby preventing clipping while maintaining real-time performance without additional delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If fixed gain is applied in spatial synthesis, then processing is computationally efficient, but dynamic range utilization is suboptimal leading to headroom or clipping issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational burdenVSAvoiddynamic range utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the gain parameter from fixed to time-varying, derived from signal energy and spatial parameters. This parameter change enables optimal dynamic range utilization by adapting gain to actual signal characteristics, preventing both headroom waste and clipping. The computational burden remains manageable because the gain calculation uses closed-form solutions based on already-computed spatial parameters, avoiding complex iterative optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces dynamics into the gain processing by making gain values time-varying and adaptive to signal conditions. This dynamic approach optimizes dynamic range utilization in real-time without significantly increasing computational complexity, as the gain values are derived directly from the energy and spatial parameters that are already being calculated for spatial rendering, avoiding heavy computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11962992B2Spatial audio processing
Publication Date: 2024.04.16 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US11962992B2 patent drawing
  • US11962992B2 patent drawing
  • US11962992B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an example embodiment, a method for processing a multi-channel input audio signal representing a sound field into a multi-channel output audio signal representing said sound field in accordance with a predefined loudspeaker layout is provided, the method comprising the following for at least one frequency band: obtaining spatial audio parameters that are descriptive of spatial characteristics of said sound field; estimating a signal energy of the sound field represented by the multi-channel input audio signal; estimating, based on said signal energy and the obtained spatial audio parameters, respective output signal energies for channels of the multi-channel output audio signal according to said predefined loudspeaker layout; determining a maximum output energy as the largest of the output signal energies across channels of said multi-channel output audio signal; and deriving, on basis of said maximum output energy, a gain value for adjusting sound reproduction gain in at least one of said channels of the multi-channel output audio signal.