Spatial Beam Quality Prediction for Low-Overhead RSRP Reporting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional beam management procedures in wireless communication involve transmitting and measuring all beams, which is inefficient and leads to high overhead and latency, while AI/ML-based methods can improve beam prediction and selection accuracy but require optimized reference signal transmission strategies.

Innovation Solution

A wireless transceiver unit (WTRU) uses AI/ML models to estimate beam qualities based on measurements of selected beams, determining and reporting beam qualities using different criteria for subsets of beams, including conditions such as SINR, CQI, noise power, and LOS probability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If all beams are transmitted and measured to identify the best beam, then beam selection accuracy is improved, but overhead and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam selection accuracyVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary beam quality estimation using AI/ML models before actual beam selection. The model predicts beam qualities based on historical data and spatial relationships, allowing the system to pre-identify potential best beams without measuring all beams, thus reducing measurement time and latency while maintaining selection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of directly measuring all beam qualities, the system uses AI/ML models to create a virtual copy or prediction of beam qualities based on measurements from a subset of beams. This predicted beam quality information is then used for beam selection, avoiding the need to physically measure all beams and reducing overhead and latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If all beams are transmitted and measured to identify the best beam, then beam selection accuracy is improved, but overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam selection accuracyVSAvoidoverhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by measuring only a subset of beams rather than all beams. The AI/ML model then infers the qualities of unmeasured beams based on the measured subset, reducing the quantity of measurements and reporting overhead while maintaining sufficient accuracy for beam selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The AI/ML model creates a predicted copy of beam quality information for beams that were not directly measured. This virtual copying approach reduces the actual measurement overhead while providing complete beam quality information for selection purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Quantity of substance

If AI/ML models are used to estimate beam qualities, then measurement overhead is reduced, but measurement precision may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement overheadVSAvoidbeam quality estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the AI/ML model continuously learns from actual beam measurements and selection outcomes. This feedback loop allows the model to refine its predictions and improve accuracy over time, compensating for the reduced measurement overhead while maintaining or enhancing beam quality estimation precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the balance between measured and predicted beam qualities based on changing conditions such as mobility, channel characteristics, and historical accuracy. By changing parameters like the subset of beams to measure or the model complexity, the system optimizes the trade-off between overhead reduction and precision maintenance under different operational scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If different criteria are used for different beam subsets, then beam management flexibility is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam management flexibilityVSAvoidreporting criteria complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by using different measurement and reporting criteria for different beam subsets based on their specific characteristics. For example, highly directional beams may use different evaluation criteria compared to omnidirectional beams. The AI/ML model handles these差异化 criteria automatically, providing flexibility while managing complexity through intelligent processing rather than explicit complex control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260032460A1Methods For Reporting Predicted RSRPs in Spatial Domain
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS INC
  • US20260032460A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032460A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032460A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless transceiver/receiver unit (WTRU) comprises a processor configured to receive configuration information that may include an indication of a first and second set of beams, where the second set of beams may be a subset of the first set of beams. The configuration may include an indication of a first set of reference signals (RSs) resources associated with the first set of beams and an indication of a second set of RS resources associated with the second set of beams. The processor may determine a measured beam quality associated with each of the beams of the second set of beams based on measurements performed on the second set of RS resources, determine a predicted measurement associated with each of the beams of the first set of beams based on the measured beam quality for the one or more beams of the second set of beams, and send a report.