Spatial Domain Detail Control for Image Noise and Sharpness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional image processors do not consider spatial factors when performing image processing techniques like noise reduction, sharpness control, color saturation, and color interpolation, leading to compromised image quality in the center portion to improve corner portions, which suffer from noise due to lack of illumination.

Innovation Solution

A global spatial domain detail controlling method that adjusts detail parameters for each pixel based on its space position within the image, allowing separate processing of the center and corner portions by using bivariate polynomials to determine appropriate spatial values for noise reduction, sharpness, color saturation, and color interpolation controls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a single specific weighting factor is used for noise reduction across the entire image, then the corner portion noise is reduced, but the center portion becomes blurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise in corner portionVSAvoidimage quality of center portion
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different weighting factors for noise reduction based on the spatial position of pixels. Corner portions use higher weighting factors to reduce noise, while center portions use lower weighting factors to preserve sharpness. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by allowing each region to be processed according to its specific quality requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The image is segmented into different regions (center and corner portions) with distinct processing parameters. By dividing the image processing into spatial zones, the patent enables independent optimization of noise reduction for corners while maintaining center portion quality, thus resolving the contradiction between noise reduction and sharpness preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If the edge gain is increased to sharpen the corner portion, then the sharpness of corner portion is improved, but the center portion becomes over-sharpened and distorted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesharpness of corner portionVSAvoidimage distortion of center portion
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements spatially varying edge gain values where corner portions receive higher gain to enhance sharpness, while center portions receive lower or zero gain to avoid over-sharpening and distortion. This local quality approach ensures each region receives appropriate sharpening treatment without adversely affecting other regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The image is divided into different processing zones with distinct edge gain parameters. By segmenting the sharpening operation into corner-specific and center-specific processing, the patent achieves improved corner sharpness while preserving center portion natural appearance without distortion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If the color saturation gain is decreased to clarify corner portion texture, then the image texture of corner portion is clear, but the image color of center portion deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage texture of corner portionVSAvoidimage color of center portion
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different color saturation gains to different spatial regions. Corner portions use lower saturation gains to reduce noise-induced color errors and clarify texture, while center portions use higher saturation gains to enhance color vibrancy and prevent color information loss. This resolves the contradiction by allowing region-specific color processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If the color interpolation threshold is increased to prevent incorrect direction determination in corner portion, then the corner portion color interpolation is accurate, but the center portion direction determination becomes unclear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterpolation direction accuracy in corner portionVSAvoiddirection determination in center portion
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements spatially varying color interpolation thresholds where corner portions use higher thresholds to filter out noise-induced false edge detections, while center portions use lower thresholds to maintain sensitivity for accurate direction determination. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between noise robustness and edge sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9008459B2Global spatial domain detail controlling method
Publication Date: 2015.04.14 NOVATEK MICROELECTRONICS CORP
  • US9008459B2 patent drawing
  • US9008459B2 patent drawing
  • US9008459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A global spatial domain detail controlling method for an image processor includes adjusting at least one detail parameter corresponding to each pixel during an image processing according to each space position of the each pixel in an image; and performing the each pixel with the image processing according to the at least one detail parameter of the each pixel.