Spatial Indexing Engine for Dynamic Asset Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing asset tracking systems are limited in their ability to manage location and status information for assets in dynamic environments, such as ships or buildings, as they require active or passive tags for each asset and fail to account for changes in the surrounding structure, and often rely on GPS which may be unreliable in such settings.

Innovation Solution

A data management framework that includes a mobile interface device, local positioning system, central processor, domain coordinate management system, asset log, and spatial indexing engine to capture and store information about assets within a structural environment, allowing for dynamic assignment of spatial addresses and updates to asset information, even in environments where the structure is changing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If GPS technology is used for wide area tracking, then location information can be obtained over large areas, but the system becomes unsuitable for narrow tracking within particular sub-spaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking coverage areaVSAvoidsuitability for narrow space tracking
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the tracking space into multiple levels: wide-area GPS tracking for overall asset location, and local sub-space tracking within specific compartments or rooms. This segmentation allows the system to provide both broad coverage and detailed localized tracking by dividing the monitoring function across different spatial scales and technological approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If transponders or tags are attached to every asset, then location information can be transmitted to a central processor, but the number of assets that can be tracked is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of trackable assetsVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs universal tracking infrastructure including fixed transponders in the environment, mobile interface devices that can track multiple assets, and a centralized processor that manages diverse asset types. This multi-functional approach allows a single system to track numerous different assets without requiring unique complex configurations for each asset type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces mobile interface devices and environmental transponders as intermediaries between assets and the central processor. These intermediaries relay location information, reducing the need for direct communication equipment on every asset and thereby increasing the number of trackable assets while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If traditional tracking systems are used in dynamic environments, then asset location can be monitored, but the systems fail to account for changes in the surrounding structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasset location accuracyVSAvoidadaptation to structural changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic tracking by continuously updating the relationship between asset locations and the changing structural environment. Mobile interface devices and environmental transponders work together to maintain accurate location data even as compartments, rooms, or structural elements move or change configuration, allowing the system to adapt to dynamic conditions in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of information

If objects are equipped with active or passive tags, then location information can be transmitted, but status information must be determined and reported by an observer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject status information availabilityVSAvoidinformation collection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables assets to self-report their status information through integrated sensors and communication capabilities. Rather than requiring external observers to determine and report status, equipped assets automatically transmit their own operational status, condition data, and other relevant information to the central processor, reducing the complexity of information collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9996551B2System and method for determining and maintaining object location and status
Publication Date: 2018.06.12 HUNTINGTON INGALLS INC
  • US9996551B2 patent drawing
  • US9996551B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An asset information management system is provided for obtaining and storing information on assets disposed within a structural environment. The system comprises at least one mobile interface device for capturing information about a target object in the structural environment. An information management operating system operates on a central processor in communication with the mobile interface device and a local positioning system. The domain coordinate management system comprises one or more computers configured for establishing spatial addresses for spaces and points within the structural environment. The asset log comprises one or more data storage modules configured for storing information associated with objects disposed within the structural environment. The spatial indexing engine is configured for assigning a spatial address to the target object and for storing information associated with the target object in the asset log.