Spatial Light Modulator High Spatial Frequency Border

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spatial light modulators (SLMs) suffer from unwanted zero-order reflections due to light interacting with the substrate outside the active pixel array, leading to undesirable zero-spatial-frequency spots, which current methods like underfilling or using dummy pixels fail to adequately address without compromising device performance.

Innovation Solution

A spatial light modulator design featuring individually-addressed phase-modulating pixels with a higher spatial frequency border array, where the border pixels are configured to impart additional phase modulations, steering peripheral light outside the target range of angles, thereby minimizing zero-order reflections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-generated harmful factors

If dummy pixels or mechanical blocking structures are used around the pixel array, then zero-order reflections are reduced, but device complexity increases and positioning precision becomes difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvezero-order reflectionsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pixel array is segmented into two distinct regions: active pixels for information modulation and border pixels for suppressing zero-order reflections. This segmentation allows each region to be optimized for its specific function, with border pixels being non individually-addressable and electrically connected together to collectively manage peripheral light

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The function of suppressing zero-order reflections is extracted from the active pixel array and assigned to a separate border pixel region. This extraction allows the active pixels to focus solely on information modulation while the border pixels handle the harmful reflection suppression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the beam size is reduced to underfill the active area, then zero-order reflections are minimized, but device performance decreases due to wasted active pixels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvezero-order reflectionsVSAvoiddevice performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Different regions of the pixel array are assigned different functions: the central active pixel array maintains full illumination for information modulation, while the peripheral border pixel region is specifically designed to handle peripheral light. This local differentiation eliminates the need to reduce overall beam size while still suppressing zero-order reflections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If peripheral light is allowed to reflect off the substrate, then beam steering coverage is maximized, but zero-spatial-frequency spots are created that are undesirable in many applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam steering coverageVSAvoidzero-spatial-frequency spots
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The border pixels convert the harmful peripheral light that would create zero-order reflections into a beneficial effect by diffracting it into higher spatial frequencies. The border pixels act as a diffraction grating that redirects peripheral light away from the zero-order direction, transforming a harmful factor into a solution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces unwanted zero-order reflections by redirecting peripheral light outside the target range, enhancing the SLM's performance without wasting active pixel illumination, thus improving beam steering accuracy and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

individually-addressed phase-modulating pixels configured to reflect and modify phasing of a beam of coherent light incident on the spatial light modulator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase modulation: Phase Modulation

Implementation Method 2

The pixels can be configured to reflect and modify phasing of a beam of coherent light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

The second array can have a second spatial frequency of N′, where N′>N, and can be configured to impart M different phase delays to a peripheral portion of the beam outside the target range of angles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Data Source

PatentUS10901289B2Reflective spatial light modulator with high spatial frequency border
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 MEADOWLARK OPTICS INC
  • US10901289B2 patent drawing
  • US10901289B2 patent drawing
  • US10901289B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spatial light modulator having an active and a peripheral region, wherein coherent light impinges on both regions, but due to a higher spatial frequency of pixels within the peripheral region, and due to biasing the peripheral region pixels to maximize dispersion of reflected light therefrom, a majority of light reflected from the peripheral region is directed outside of a three-dimensional target window. A spatial frequency of the pixels in the active region is selected such that maximum dispersion of reflected light from the active region is incident within the three-dimensional target window. In this way, incident light that does not reflect from the active region need not be absorbed, or blocked, but instead can be reflected, but still fails to interfere with the target window.