Spatial Merge Motion Vector Offsets for Better Video Coding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image encoding/decoding methods require performance improvements, particularly in image processing, to keep up with the increasing demand for efficient multimedia data handling.

Innovation Solution

An image encoding/decoding apparatus that modifies a motion vector predictor using an adjustment offset, constructing a motion information prediction candidate list, selecting a prediction candidate index, and deriving a prediction motion vector adjustment offset based on offset information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If existing image encoding/decoding methods are used, then the system can process multimedia data, but the coding performance and processing efficiency are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding performanceVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by constructing a motion information prediction candidate list before actual motion vector encoding. The list includes spatial candidates from adjacent blocks and temporal candidates from reference frames, prepared in advance to enable efficient selection during encoding/decoding operations, thereby improving coding performance without increasing processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by deriving motion vectors from candidate blocks in the prediction list. Instead of calculating motion vectors from scratch for each block, the system copies motion information from spatially adjacent blocks or temporally correlated reference frames, significantly improving processing efficiency while maintaining coding performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If motion vector prediction is performed without adjustment offsets, then the encoding process is simpler, but the prediction accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidencoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing adjustment offsets specifically for candidates that require refinement. Instead of applying complex adjustments to all candidates uniformly, the system selectively applies offsets only to spatial candidates where local motion variations exist, improving prediction accuracy while controlling encoding complexity through targeted refinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by modifying motion vector parameters through adjustment offsets. The encoder derives offset values based on local motion characteristics and applies them to candidate motion vectors, dynamically changing the parameters to improve prediction accuracy without fundamentally altering the encoding structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12537961B2Image encoding/decoding method and device for a spatial merge candidate derived from a spatially adjacent block of the target block
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 INST OF IMAGE TECH INC
  • US12537961B2 patent drawing
  • US12537961B2 patent drawing
  • US12537961B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image encoding and decoding method and device are disclosed. The method includes configuring a motion information candidate list of a target block, selecting a candidate index from the list, deriving an offset for adjusting a motion vector, and recovering a motion vector of the target block based on a predicted motion vector on the basis of the offset.