Spatial Metadata Reordering for Consistent Audio Direction Cues

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing immersive audio codecs face issues with sub-optimal encoding and decoding of spatial metadata due to inconsistent ordering and shuffling of directional metadata parameters, leading to smeared and distorted spatial audio representations, especially at lower bitrates.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves determining an ordering error in the directional metadata parameters by comparing similarity and difference measures between neighboring time-frequency tiles and reordering these parameters to align them correctly, ensuring consistent metadata ordering and reducing temporal and frequency resolution based on audio input characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If directional metadata parameters are encoded without ordering correction, then encoding complexity is reduced, but spatial audio quality deteriorates due to smeared and distorted representations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial audio qualityVSAvoidencoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by detecting ordering errors in directional metadata parameters before the encoding process. The system identifies when neighboring time-frequency tiles have inconsistent directional parameter ordering and corrects these errors prior to encoding, preventing spatial distortion from occurring in the first place rather than attempting to fix it afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using similarity measures to compare directional metadata parameters across neighboring time-frequency tiles. The system continuously monitors for ordering inconsistencies and uses this feedback information to trigger reordering operations when errors are detected, creating a closed-loop quality assurance mechanism during encoding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If bitrate is reduced for efficient transmission, then transmission efficiency improves, but spatial metadata encoding quality deteriorates leading to distorted audio output

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoidspatial metadata encoding quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by correcting ordering errors in directional metadata parameters before encoding at reduced bitrate. By ensuring proper parameter ordering upfront, the system prevents cumulative errors that would otherwise be magnified during compression, maintaining spatial accuracy even when transmission efficiency is prioritized through lower bitrate encoding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If directional metadata parameters are reordered to correct ordering errors, then spatial audio quality improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial audio qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by focusing ordering error correction only on specific time-frequency tiles where inconsistencies are detected, rather than reordering all parameters universally. The system uses similarity measures to identify localized ordering errors and applies reordering only where needed, maintaining high spatial audio quality while minimizing unnecessary processing overhead in regions where ordering is already correct.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by performing ordering error correction selectively rather than comprehensively. The system detects and corrects only the specific ordering errors that affect spatial quality, leaving other parameters unchanged. This partial correction approach achieves sufficient quality improvement without the full processing cost of complete reordering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260019742A1Spatial metadata direction harmonization
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US20260019742A1 patent drawing
  • US20260019742A1 patent drawing
  • US20260019742A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus comprising means for: obtaining, with respect to at least two sources within an audio scene, ordered directional metadata parameters associated with the at least two sources and identifying a direction-of-arrival with respect to the at least two sources and arranged in frames arranged as a grid of time-frequency tiles with respect to a time-axis and a frequency axis; determining an ordering error with respect to at least one time-frequency tile directional metadata parameter, the ordering error configured to identify that at least one neighbouring time-frequency tile directional metadata parameter associated with another order index is more similar and/or less different with respect to the at least one time-frequency tile directional metadata parameter than the at least one neighbouring time-frequency tile directional metadata parameter associated with the same order index; and reordering the determined at least one time-frequency tile directional metadata parameter to the another order index.