Spatial Pipelining SIMD Reductions Scans

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional algorithms for prefix sum operations are not optimized for efficiently computing multiple scans in parallel, leading to performance and efficiency pitfalls on SIMD hardware platforms, with techniques like Kogge-Stone and Blelloch's algorithms resulting in redundant computations and poor average parallelism.

Innovation Solution

Pipelining reduction and scan operations by concurrently applying binary associative operations at different levels of upsweep and downsweep trees, with data exchange through caches, scratch pads, and lane interchange logic, allowing multiple subsets of processing unit lanes to perform operations in parallel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If conventional algorithms like Kogge-Stone are used for prefix sum operations, then minimum tree depth is achieved, but redundant computations occur leading to reduced efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputation speedVSAvoidredundant computations
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm segments the prefix sum computation into distinct phases (upsweep and downsweep) with different operational modes. During upsweep, lanes perform reductions; during downsweep, lanes perform scans. This segmentation eliminates redundant computations by ensuring each lane performs only necessary operations for its specific computation stage, resolving the contradiction between achieving minimum tree depth and avoiding redundant work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The algorithm dynamically adjusts the operational mode of SIMD lanes based on the current phase of computation. Lanes transition between performing reductions and performing scans depending on whether the system is in upsweep or downsweep phase. This dynamic behavior allows the system to maintain minimum tree depth while eliminating redundant computations that would occur if all lanes performed the same operations throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If Blelloch's upsweep and downsweep stages are used, then scan operations are performed, but a large number of SIMD lanes are left idle resulting in poor average parallelism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan operation throughputVSAvoidSIMD lane utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm ensures continuous useful action by keeping all SIMD lanes actively engaged throughout both upsweep and downsweep phases. During upsweep, all lanes perform reductions. During downsweep, all lanes perform scans using the accumulated data from upsweep. This continuous engagement of all lanes eliminates idle time and maintains high parallelism throughout the entire computation, resolving the contradiction between scan operation throughput and SIMD lane utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The algorithm adds a temporal dimension to the computation by overlapping the upsweep and downsweep phases across multiple iterations. While one set of lanes completes upsweep, another set begins downsweep, and subsequent iterations continue this pattern. This dimensional approach ensures that at any given time, all lanes are productively engaged in either upsweep or downsweep operations, maximizing parallelism without increasing hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If traditional prefix sum algorithms are used, then single scan computation is optimized, but multiple scans in parallel are not efficiently computed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle scan accuracyVSAvoidmultiple parallel scans throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm creates a universal computation framework that handles both single scan and multiple parallel scans using the same upsweep-downsweep structure. The same SIMD lanes and memory resources are reused across multiple scan iterations, with each iteration processing a different set of input data. This multi-functionality allows the system to maintain single scan accuracy while efficiently computing multiple scans in parallel, resolving the contradiction between precision and throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The algorithm employs periodic action by structuring multiple scan computations as repeated iterations of the upsweep-downsweep cycle. Each iteration processes a different portion of the overall input data while following the same computational pattern. This periodic structure allows the system to maintain the precision of individual scan operations while achieving high throughput for multiple parallel scans through systematic repetition and resource reuse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11138015B2Spatial pipelining of software reductions and scans
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC
  • US11138015B2 patent drawing
  • US11138015B2 patent drawing
  • US11138015B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A compute unit includes single-instruction-multiple-data (SIMD) lanes that implement a pipeline. The compute unit also includes a scheduler to schedule the SIMD lanes to apply a binary associative operation to pairs of elements associated with ordered sets of elements. Subsets of the SIMD lanes concurrently apply the binary associative operation to pairs of elements at different levels of upsweep trees associated with the ordered sets of elements. Application of the binary associative operation is used to perform a reduction operation or a scan operation on the ordered sets of elements. In the case of a scan operation, the scheduler schedules the SIMD lanes to concurrently apply the binary associative operation to pairs of elements at different levels of downsweep trees associated with the ordered sets of elements subsequent to applying the binary associative operation at different levels of the upsweep trees.