Spatial Scalability Picture-Level Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video coding technologies, such as H.264/MPEG-4 AVC, lack support for non-dyadic spatial scalability, limiting their ability to handle resolutions that are not powers of 2, and require computationally cumbersome half-sample interpolation for quarter-sample positions, which affects the quality and efficiency of picture up-sampling in spatial scalable video coding.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution introduces a method for extended spatial scalability with picture-level adaptation, allowing for non-dyadic scaling by refining inter-layer prediction methods and using direct interpolation with 6-tap filters for finer resolution, reducing computational complexity and improving up-sampled picture quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If quarter-sample interpolation is used for picture up-sampling, then the interpolation resolution is limited to quarter samples, but this limitation prevents support for non-dyadic scaling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterpolation resolutionVSAvoidsupport for non-dyadic scaling
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the interpolation resolution parameter from quarter-sample to sixteenth-sample, enabling finer resolution up-sampling. This parameter change allows the system to support non-dyadic scaling ratios while maintaining high interpolation quality, as the finer resolution provides the necessary precision for arbitrary scaling factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If half-sample interpolation is used to achieve quarter-sample position, then the desired resolution is obtained, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterpolation resolutionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the multi-stage mechanical-like process of half-sample followed by quarter-sample interpolation with a direct sixteenth-sample interpolation mechanism. This substitution eliminates the need for sequential processing stages, reducing computational complexity while achieving the desired fine resolution directly in a single step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If low pass filtering is applied to all blocks, then blocking artifacts are reduced, but blurring artifacts are introduced and processing resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblocking artifactsVSAvoidblurring artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by filtering only those blocks that actually contain blocking artifacts, rather than uniformly filtering all blocks. This selective filtering approach preserves image quality in regions without artifacts while reducing unnecessary blurring and processing overhead in regions where blocking artifacts are absent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7961963B2Methods and systems for extended spatial scalability with picture-level adaptation
Publication Date: 2011.06.14 DOLBY LABORATORIES LICENSING CORP
  • US7961963B2 patent drawing
  • US7961963B2 patent drawing
  • US7961963B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention comprise systems and methods for modification of motion vectors in spatial scalable video coding. Some embodiments of the present invention comprise methods and systems designed for use with the Scalable Video Coding extension of H.264/MPEG-4 AVC.