Spatial-Temporal Merge Candidates for Accurate Inter-Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video compression technologies face challenges in efficiently predicting pixel values across high-resolution and high-quality videos, particularly in constructing accurate merge candidate lists and performing inter-prediction, which affects encoding/decoding performance and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

The method and apparatus enhance inter-prediction by constructing a merge candidate list that includes spatial, temporal, and combined merge candidates, deriving motion information through weighted averages, and using affine models to improve prediction accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing inter-prediction technology is used, then video compression can be achieved, but prediction accuracy for high-resolution and high-quality videos is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidencoding/decoding efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the prediction process by dividing merge candidates into distinct categories (spatial merge candidates from neighboring blocks, temporal merge candidates from temporal neighbors, and combined merge candidates). This segmentation allows each candidate type to be processed and evaluated independently, improving prediction accuracy for high-resolution videos while maintaining encoding efficiency through structured evaluation procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple prediction sources by combining spatial merge candidates (from spatial neighboring blocks), temporal merge candidates (from temporal neighboring blocks), and combined merge candidates into a unified merge candidate list. This merging approach leverages both spatial and temporal information to achieve more accurate predictions for high-quality video encoding while maintaining efficient processing through integrated evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If merge candidate list construction is simplified, then encoding speed increases, but prediction accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidencoding time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by constructing different types of merge candidates based on local characteristics - spatial merge candidates use information from spatially neighboring blocks, temporal merge candidates use information from temporally neighboring blocks, and combined merge candidates integrate both. This localized approach to quality construction improves prediction accuracy without requiring uniform complex processing across all candidates, thus managing encoding time effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-constructing merge candidates from neighboring blocks before the actual prediction process. Spatial merge candidates are derived from spatial neighbors, temporal merge candidates from temporal neighbors, and combined candidates are prepared in advance. This preliminary construction reduces the computational burden during the main prediction process, improving accuracy while controlling encoding time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If motion information derivation uses complex methods, then prediction accuracy improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion information accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses copying by deriving motion information through copying and adapting existing motion data from neighboring blocks. Spatial merge candidates copy motion information from spatial neighbors, temporal merge candidates copy from temporal neighbors, and combined candidates integrate both sources. This copying approach achieves accurate motion information derivation without requiring complex computation, as it leverages existing data rather than calculating from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by adjusting how motion information is derived based on the type of merge candidate. Different weighting factors and combination methods are applied when deriving motion information from spatial versus temporal candidates, or when combining both. These parameter adjustments optimize prediction accuracy for different video scenarios while keeping the overall computational complexity manageable through systematic parameter application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250301167A1Merge mode-based inter-prediction method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP LTD
  • US20250301167A1 patent drawing
  • US20250301167A1 patent drawing
  • US20250301167A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A video encoding/decoding method is provided, which includes constructing a merge candidate list of a current block, deriving motion information of the current block from the merge candidate list, and performing inter-prediction of the current block using the motion information, where the merge candidate list includes at least one of a spatial merge candidate, a temporal merge candidate, or a combined merge candidate, and the combined merge candidate is derived by combining n merge candidates belonging to the merge candidate list. A video encoding/decoding apparatus is also provided.