Speaker Verification Using Global Model and Noise Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing speaker verification systems face inefficiencies in large-scale applications due to high false acceptance and rejection rates, long enrolling sessions, and the need for extensive verification data, which hinder usability and increase traffic load, especially in telephone network environments.

Innovation Solution

A biometric control method using voice verification with limited enrolling data and short verification sentences, employing an equalization method and unsupervised intra-speaker and noise compensation technique, allowing simultaneous authentication across multiple users and reducing the need for additional infrastructure, while maintaining low error rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If speaker verification systems use traditional methods with multiple client templates, then verification accuracy is improved, but system complexity and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the client-specific template matching step from the verification process. Instead of comparing verification speech against multiple client templates, the system only maintains a single global speaker model and verifies whether the verification speech belongs to any speaker in the database, eliminating the need for n identification distance evaluations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a universal speaker verification system with a single global speaker model that serves all clients. This universal model replaces the need for individual client-specific templates, allowing the system to verify any speaker without requiring separate model maintenance and comparison for each client.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If speaker verification systems require long enrolling sessions and extensive verification data, then error rates are reduced, but usability and traffic load are negatively impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror rateVSAvoidusability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of data requirement from extensive to limited. By using a global speaker model with unsupervised adaptation that automatically adjusts to individual speaker characteristics during verification, the system achieves reliable error rates with minimal enrolling data and short verification sentences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs unsupervised adaptation automatically during the verification process without requiring manual intervention or extensive pre-enrollment. The global speaker model self-adjusts to individual speaker characteristics on-the-fly, enabling the system to maintain low error rates with minimal user input and short verification sentences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If speaker verification systems process multiple client templates, then comprehensive verification is achieved, but processing time and traffic load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification coverageVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the computationally intensive step of comparing verification speech against multiple client templates. The system only performs single-model verification against the global speaker model, dramatically reducing processing time while maintaining verification coverage through unsupervised adaptation to individual speaker characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Adaptability or versatility

If speaker verification systems implement unsupervised adaptation to capture voice variations, then adaptability is improved, but error propagation risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoice variation captureVSAvoiderror propagation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a global speaker model as an intermediary between the verification speech and the decision process. This intermediary model performs unsupervised adaptation to capture voice variations while providing a stable reference framework that prevents error propagation, as adaptation errors are localized to the model adjustment rather than propagated through multiple template comparisons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8050920B2Biometric control method on the telephone network with speaker verification technology by using an intra speaker variability and additive noise unsupervised compensation
Publication Date: 2011.11.01 UNIVERSITY OF CHILE
  • US8050920B2 patent drawing
  • US8050920B2 patent drawing
  • US8050920B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A large-scale attendance, productivity, activity and availability biometric control method using the telephone network, for individual client users with speaker verification technology based on limited enrolling data and short verification sentences. The method includes the steps of registering and enrolling a client user; generating, storing and indexing a template and a reference average spectrum with a client user PIN; prompting the client user during a future verification event to pronounce the enrolling/verification sentence associated with the PIN to provide a speech signal; estimating a verification distance between the PIN indexed template and the speech signal pronounced by the client user, using the PIN reference average spectrum indexed; validating the telephone number; deciding if the pronounced speech signal pronounced by the client user has been validated based on the verification distance, with unsupervised compensation of the noisy input signal's spectrum if its difference from the speaker model is small, instead of adapting the user model spectrum; optionally repeating the steps of prompting, estimating, validating and deciding for a limited number of times; and accepting or rejecting the future verification event.