Specialized Bearers for Latency-Sensitive Network Traffic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current telecommunications networks fail to provide adequate low-latency Quality of Service (QoS) for latency-sensitive traffic, such as multiplayer games, by routing such traffic in the same manner as non-latency-sensitive traffic, leading to suboptimal performance.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of specialized bearers with low-latency QoS parameters, which can be requested by terminals and established through a bearer-management system, allowing for the creation of dedicated connections with lower latency than standard bearers, specifically utilizing LTE data radio bearers, S1 bearers, and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) Radio Access Bearers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If latency-sensitive traffic is routed in the same manner as non-latency-sensitive traffic, then network infrastructure complexity is reduced, but latency performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork infrastructure complexityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments network traffic into different bearers based on latency sensitivity requirements. Standard bearers handle non-latency-sensitive traffic while specialized low-latency bearers handle latency-sensitive traffic such as multiplayer games. This segmentation allows differentiated handling of traffic types without requiring complete network redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces specialized low-latency bearers as intermediary transmission paths between terminals and the network core. These bearers act as dedicated channels that prioritize latency-sensitive traffic, inserting an intermediate layer of specialized routing between the terminal and standard network infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of time

If specialized bearers with low-latency QoS parameters are implemented, then latency performance is improved, but network complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidnetwork complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes QoS parameters specifically for specialized bearers, setting lower latency targets (e.g., 50ms or less) compared to standard bearers. This parameter differentiation enables the network to provide improved latency performance for specific traffic types while maintaining standard parameters for other traffic, avoiding the need to redesign the entire network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11695636B2Latency-sensitive network-traffic quality of service
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 T MOBILE US INC
  • US11695636B2 patent drawing
  • US11695636B2 patent drawing
  • US11695636B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A telecommunication system can include routing devices, a bearer-management device, and a policy-management device. The bearer-management device can receive a request from a terminal to create a specialized bearer (SB) for a non-audio, non-video media type. The bearer-management device can determine that the request is associated with an authorized user, and then send a setup message comprising a Quality of Service (QoS) indicator to the policy-management device. The policy-management device can create the SB permitting data exchange between the terminal and a routing device. The SB can have QoS characteristics associated with the QoS indicator. In some examples, the terminal can receive a network address, determine an associated network port, and send a SIP INVITE message indicating the non-audio, non-video media type. The terminal can then exchange data on the network port with a peer network terminal.