Specialized Dictionary for Automated Governance Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated governance tools struggle to effectively understand and comply with complex bodies of regulations due to their reliance on general-purpose dictionaries that fail to capture nuanced information and relationships between terms, leading to inaccurate compliance efforts.

Innovation Solution

A specialized dictionary and software facility that manages multiple definitions, recognizes ambiguities, and establishes complex hierarchies of terms, supporting named entity recognition, parts of speech tagging, and natural language processing to provide a coordinated understanding of authority documents, enhancing compliance efforts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If general-purpose dictionaries are used for automated governance tools, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision and reliability of compliance understanding deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesentence-processing accuracyVSAvoiddictionary structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dictionary is segmented into multiple specialized domains (e.g., healthcare, finance, law) with domain-specific thesauri and relationship structures. Each domain contains tailored term definitions, relationships, and contextual information relevant to that specific field, allowing the system to achieve high measurement precision in sentence processing without requiring a single overly complex universal dictionary structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the dictionary system are given different qualities and structures based on their specific function. Domain-specific sections contain detailed contextual relationships and definitions appropriate to that domain, while the overall system maintains a manageable structure through modular organization. This allows high precision in local sentence processing tasks without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If conventional natural language processing tools are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability of understanding authority documents deteriorates due to inadequate capture of term relationships and ambiguities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance understanding accuracyVSAvoiddictionary management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-establishing comprehensive term relationships, definitions, and contextual information in domain-specific thesauri before processing authority documents. Ambiguities and multiple definitions are pre-resolved through structured relationships and contextual cues embedded in the dictionary, allowing conventional NLP tools to operate reliably without requiring complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The specialized dictionary system acts as an intermediary layer between conventional NLP tools and authority documents. It provides pre-processed term relationships, definitions, and contextual information that bridge the gap between simple NLP operations and the complex requirements of regulatory compliance understanding, thereby improving reliability without requiring complex modifications to the NLP tools themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If static general-purpose dictionaries are used, then ease of manufacture and operation are improved, but adaptability to specific regulatory domains and nuanced term relationships deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedomain-specific understanding capabilityVSAvoiddictionary maintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dictionary system is divided into separate domain-specific thesauri (e.g., healthcare, finance, law) that can be independently developed, maintained, and updated. Each domain section contains terminology and relationships specific to that regulatory area, allowing the system to adapt to different domains without requiring complete reconfiguration of the entire dictionary structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dictionary system is designed to be dynamic rather than static, with mechanisms for continuous updating and refinement of term definitions and relationships. Domain-specific sections can be adapted to emerging regulatory requirements and changing terminology, allowing the system to maintain high adaptability while managing complexity through modular, independently-updatable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9977775B2Structured dictionary
Publication Date: 2018.05.22 UNIFIED COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORK NETWORK FRONTIERS
  • US9977775B2 patent drawing
  • US9977775B2 patent drawing
  • US9977775B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A dictionary data structure is described. The data structure is made up of first, second, and third tables. The first table is comprised of entries each representing a natural language term, each entry of the first table containing a term ID identifying its term. The second table is comprised of entries each representing a definition, each entry of the second containing a definition ID identifying its definition. The third table is comprised of entries each representing correspondence between a terminate definition defining the term, each entry of the third table containing term ID identifying the defined term and a definition ID identifying the defining definition. The contents of the data structure are usable to identify any definitions corresponding to a term.